首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program
【2h】

Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program

机译:使用常规或加速护理程序的单室膝关节置换术后的相似临床结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and purpose Over the last 5 years, there has been increasing interest in reducing length of hospitalization (LOS) through accelerated programs. We examined the clinical outcome of patients undergoing a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in an accelerated care program (A group) compared to a conventional care program (C group).>Methods 40 patients randomized into 2 groups were included (A group: 17 patients; C group: 23 patients). Nausea, micturition problems, lower limb dysfunction, pain (VAS), opiate consumption, Knee Society score (KSS), day of discharge, rehospitalization within 3 months, contact with a general physician or nurse, and level of satisfaction were registered. Patients in the A group attended an information meeting. An intraarticular infiltration with Marcaine and adrenaline was used peroperatively. Patients in the C group had an epidural pump for 2 or 3 days. Patients in the A program were treated with NSAID and paracetamol postoperatively. Opiates were used in both groups in the case of breakthrough pain. The patients were considered ready for discharge when they were able to climb stairs to the second floor within 5 min.>Results The median length of stay was 1 (1–3) day in the A group and 6 (4–7) days in the C group. The median pain score (VAS) at day 0 was 1 (0–3) in the A group and 5 (0–8) in the C group (p < 0.001). 11/23 of the patients in the C group had weakness of the lower limbs on day 1 due to the epidural; all patients in the A group were exercising on the day of the operation. Micturition problems necessitating intermediate catherization were more frequent in patients in the C program (19/23) than in patients in the A programme (3/17) (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning nausea, average pain on days 1 and 2, use of opioids (during the first week postoperatively), KSS, contact with primary sector, level of satisfaction, or level of confidence.>Interpretation We achieved a reduction in LOS of 5 days without affecting the clinical outcome.
机译:>背景和目的在过去的五年中,人们越来越关注通过加速计划来缩短住院时间。我们比较了常规护理程序(C组)和加速护理程序(A组)中接受单室膝关节置换术(UKR)的患者的临床结局。>方法将40例患者随机分为两组包括(A组:17例; C组:23例)。记录恶心,排尿困难,下肢功能障碍,疼痛(VAS),鸦片消费,膝关节评分(KSS),出院日,3个月内再次住院,与普通医师或护士接触以及满意度。 A组患者参加了信息发布会。术中使用马卡因和肾上腺素进行关节内浸润。 C组患者硬膜外泵治疗2或3天。 A计划的患者术后接受NSAID和扑热息痛治疗。在突破性疼痛的情况下,两组均使用阿片类药物。当患者能够在5分钟内爬楼梯到二楼时,他们被认为可以出院。>结果 A组的中位住院时间为1(1-3)天,而6组的中位住院时间为6( C组为4-7天。 A组第0天的中位疼痛评分(VAS)为1(0–3),C组为5(0–8)(p <0.001)。 C组患者中有11/23在第1天由于硬膜外下肢无力;手术当天,A组所有患者均在锻炼。 C程序(19/23)的患者比中A程序(3/17)的患者更需要进行中间导管插入术的排尿问题更为常见(p = 0.001)。两组之间关于恶心,第1天和第2天的平均疼痛,使用阿片类药物(术后第一周期间),KSS,与主要部门的接触,满意度或信心水平无统计学差异。 >解释我们在不影响临床结果的情况下将LOS降低了5天。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号