首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Team-Based Learning to Improve Learning Outcomes in a Therapeutics Course Sequence
【2h】

Team-Based Learning to Improve Learning Outcomes in a Therapeutics Course Sequence

机译:基于团队的学习以改善治疗学课程的学习成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To compare the effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) to that of traditional lectures on learning outcomes in a therapeutics course sequence.>Design. A revised TBL curriculum was implemented in a therapeutic course sequence. Multiple choice and essay questions identical to those used to test third-year students (P3) taught using a traditional lecture format were administered to the second-year pharmacy students (P2) taught using the new TBL format.>Assessment. One hundred thirty-one multiple-choice questions were evaluated; 79 tested recall of knowledge and 52 tested higher level, application of knowledge. For the recall questions, students taught through traditional lectures scored significantly higher compared to the TBL students (88%±12% vs 82%±16%, p=0.01). For the questions assessing application of knowledge, no differences were seen between teaching pedagogies (81%±16% vs 77%±20%, p=0.24). Scores on essay questions and the number of students who achieved 100% were also similar between groups.>Conclusion. Transition to a TBL format from a traditional lecture-based pedagogy allowed P2 students to perform at a similar level as students with an additional year of pharmacy education on application of knowledge type questions. However, P3 students outperformed P2 students regarding recall type questions and overall. Further assessment of long-term learning outcomes is needed to determine if TBL produces more persistent learning and improved application in clinical settings.
机译:>目标。将团队学习(TBL)的效果与传统课程在治疗课程中学习成果的传统效果进行比较。>设计。实施了修订的TBL课程按照治疗过程的顺序。将与使用传统讲座形式测试的三年级学生(P3)相同的多项选择题和论文问题分配给使用新的TBL格式进行教学的二年级药学学生(P2)。>评估。评估了131个多项选择题; 79项测试了知识的回忆,52项测试了知识的更高层次的应用。对于回忆性问题,通过传统讲座授课的学生的得分明显高于TBL学生(88%±12%对82%±16%,p = 0.01)。对于评估知识应用的问题,教学方法之间没有差异(81%±16%对77%±20%,p = 0.24)。小组之间的论文问题分数和达到100%的学生人数也相似。>结论。从传统的基于演讲的教学法向TBL格式的过渡使P2学生的表现与接受有关知识型问题应用的药学教育的学生。但是,在回忆类型问题和总体上,P3学生的表现优于P2学生。需要进一步评估长期学习成果,以确定TBL是否在临床环境中产生更持久的学习并改善应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号