首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Incorporation of Bloom’s Taxonomy into Multiple-Choice Examination Questions for a Pharmacotherapeutics Course
【2h】

Incorporation of Bloom’s Taxonomy into Multiple-Choice Examination Questions for a Pharmacotherapeutics Course

机译:将Bloom的分类法纳入药物治疗课程的多项选择题中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy into multiple-choice examination questions in a pharmacotherapeutics course and assess its effectiveness in detecting areas of improvement in learning.>Design. Bloom’s taxonomy was incorporated into examination questions through a multi-step process: Sample questions representing each learning domain within Bloom’s taxonomy (knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation) were introduced to students during lecture presentations and discussions. Quiz and examination containing questions categorized according to Bloom’s taxonomy were administered to students. During review sessions following each quiz or examination, the categorization of each question was provided to students and feedback from students was gathered.>Assessment. The effect of the 5 types of test questions on the correct response fraction and discrimination index was determined after combining synthesis and evaluation. Correct response fractions for knowledge, comprehension, and application questions were significantly higher than those for analysis and synthesis/evaluation questions (p<0.05). However, discrimination index for application and synthesis/evaluation questions were significantly higher than those for knowledge and comprehension questions (p<0.05). In interviews with students who had requested learning assistance, the majority realized the importance of critical-thinking skills in the learning process.>Conclusion. Well-designed multiple-choice questions incorporating different learning domains of Bloom’s taxonomy may be a potential method of assessing critical-thinking skills in large classes of students.
机译:>目标。将Bloom的分类法纳入药物治疗课程的多项选择题中,并评估其在检测学习方面的有效性。>设计。 Bloom的分类法已纳入考试通过多步过程提出的问题:在讲座演示和讨论期间,向学生介绍了代表Bloom分类法中每个学习领域的示例问题(知识,理解,应用,分析,综合和评估)。对学生进行了测验和考试,其中包含根据Bloom的分类法分类的问题。在每个测验或考试后的复习期间,将每个问题的类别提供给学生,并收集学生的反馈。>评估。 5种类型的测试问题对正确答案分数和歧视的影响综合和评估后确定指数。知识,理解和应用问题的正确回答分数显着高于分析和综合/评估问题的回答分数(p <0.05)。但是,应用和综合/评估问题的辨别指数明显高于知识和理解问题的辨别指数(p <0.05)。在接受要求学习帮助的学生的采访中,大多数人意识到了批判性思维技能在学习过程中的重要性。>结论。精心设计的多项选择题结合了Bloom的分类法的不同学习领域,可能是一种评估大班学生批判性思维能力的潜在方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号