首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. cohort results from a four-year community intervention.
【2h】

Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. cohort results from a four-year community intervention.

机译:戒烟社区干预试验(COMMIT):I.队列研究是四年社区干预的结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES. The primary hypothesis of COMMIT (Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation) was that a community-level, multi-channel, 4-year intervention would increase quit rates among cigarette smokers, with heavy smokers (> or = 25 cigarettes per day) of priority. METHODS. One community within each of 11 matched community pairs (10 in the United States, 1 in Canada) was randomly assigned to intervention. Endpoint cohorts totaling 10,019 heavy smokers and 10,328 light-to-moderate smokers were followed by telephone. RESULTS. The mean heavy smoker quit rate (i.e., the fraction of cohort members who had achieved and maintained cessation at the end of the trial) was 0.180 for intervention communities versus 0.187 for comparison communities, a nonsignificant difference (one-sided P = .68 by permutation test; 90% test-based confidence interval (CI) for the difference = -0.031, 0.019). For light-to-moderate smokers, corresponding quit rates were 0.306 and 0.275; this difference was significant (P = .004; 90% CI = 0.014, 0.047). Smokers in intervention communities had greater perceived exposure to smoking control activities, which correlated with outcome only for light-to-moderate smokers. CONCLUSIONS. The impact of this community-based intervention on light-to-moderate smokers, although modest, has public health importance. This intervention did not increase quit rates of heavy smokers; reaching them may require new clinical programs and policy changes.
机译:目标COMMIT(戒烟社区干预试验)的主要假设是,社区一级,多渠道,为期4年的干预将提高吸烟者的戒烟率,其中重度吸烟者(每天≥25支) 。方法。在11个匹配的社区对中的每个社区中(美国为10个,加拿大为1个)随机分配了一个社区。终点队列中共有10019名重度吸烟者和10328名轻度至中度吸烟者。结果。干预社区的平均重度吸烟者戒烟率(即在试验结束时达到并维持戒烟的队列成员的比例)为0.180,而比较社区为0.187,差异无统计学意义(单侧P = .68排列检验;基于检验的90%置信区间(CI)= -0.031,0.019)。轻度至中度吸烟者的相应戒烟率为0.306和0.275;这种差异非常显着(P = 0.004; 90%CI = 0.014,0.047)。干预社区中的吸烟者对吸烟控制活动的感知更大,这仅与轻度至中度吸烟者的结果相关。结论。这种以社区为基础的干预措施对轻度至中度吸烟者的影响虽然适度,但对公共卫生具有重要意义。这种干预并没有增加大量吸烟者的戒烟率。接触他们可能需要新的临床计划和政策变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号