首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.
【2h】

Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.

机译:MEDLINE中针对临床内容的经验搜索策略的鲁棒性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: It is important for clinical end users of MEDLINE to be able to retrieve articles that are both scientifically sound and directly relevant to clinical practice. The use of methodologic search filters (such as "random allocation" for sound studies of medical interventions) has been advocated to improve the accuracy of searching for such studies. Methodologic search filters have been tested in previous MEDLINE files but indexing continues to evolve and the operating characteristics of these search filters in current MEDLINE files are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000. DESIGN: A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance. METHODS: 6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies. RESULTS: Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of "clinical trial (pt)" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments. CONCLUSION: Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.
机译:背景:对于MEDLINE的临床最终用户来说,重要的是能够检索科学上合理且与临床实践直接相关的文章。提倡使用方法搜索过滤器(例如“随机分配”进行合理的医学干预研究)以提高搜索此类研究的准确性。方法搜索过滤器已经在以前的MEDLINE文件中进行了测试,但是索引仍在不断发展,并且当前MEDLINE文件中这些搜索过滤器的操作特性未知。目的:确定1991年开发的经验搜索策略在2000年检测MEDLINE中临床含量的鲁棒性。设计:一项基于171项核心保健期刊的手工搜索,使用预定的质量指标进行科学价值和临床相关性的调查。方法:6位训练有素,经验丰富的研究助理阅读了2000年出版发行的171种期刊的所有期刊。每篇文章均使用目的和质量指标进行评分,并归类为临床相关的原始研究,评论文章,一般论文或病例报告。然后,在治疗/质量改善,诊断,预后,因果关系,经济学,临床预测以及定性和评论文章等方面,由于方法学上的严谨性,原始文章和评论文章被归类为“通过”或“失败”。 1991年开发的搜索策略在2000数据库中进行了测试。主要观察指标:敏感性,特异性,准确性和准确性。结果:1991年开发的搜索策略在最佳单项和高灵敏度MEDLINE搜索治疗,预后,病因和诊断研究的术语组合方面通常至少表现出色。例如,用于检索高质量治疗研究的“临床试验(pt)”的准确性从91.6%提高到94.4%(P <0.05)。结论:1991年开发的大多数MEDLINE搜索策略在2000出版年进行搜索时都非常可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号