首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network
【2h】

Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network

机译:快速评估生物恐怖主义行为者:在基于实践的研究网络中使用电子通信定义吸入性炭疽的鉴别诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Early detection of bioterrorism requires assessment of diagnoses assigned to cases of rare diseases with which clinicians have little experience. In this study, we evaluated the process of defining the differential diagnosis for inhalational anthrax using electronic communication within a practice-based research network (PBRN) and compared the results with those obtained from a nationwide random sample of family physicians with a mailed instrument.>METHODS We distributed survey instruments by e-mail to 55 physician members of the Wisconsin Research Network (WReN), a regional PBRN. The instruments consisted of 3 case vignettes randomly drawn from a set describing 11 patients with inhalational anthrax, 2 with influenza A, and 1 with Legionella pneumonia. Physicians provided their most likely nonanthrax diagnosis, along with their responses to 4 yes-or-no management questions for each case. Physicians who had not responded at 1 week received a second e-mail with the survey instrument. The comparison group consisted of the nationwide sample of physicians who completed mailed survey instruments. Primary outcome measures were response rate, median response time, and frequencies of diagnostic categories assigned to cases of inhalational anthrax.>RESULTS The PBRN response rate compared favorably with that of the national sample (47.3% vs 37.0%; P = not significant). The median response time for the PBRN was significantly shorter than that for the national sample (2 vs 28 days; P <.001). No significant differences were found between the PBRN and the Midwest subset of the national sample in the frequencies of major diagnostic categories or in case management.>CONCLUSIONS Electronic means of creating differential diagnoses for rare infectious diseases of national significance is feasible within PBRNs. Information is much more rapidly acquired and is consistent with that obtained by conventional methods.
机译:>目的生物恐怖主义的早期发现需要评估分配给临床医生经验很少的罕见疾病的诊断。在这项研究中,我们评估了在基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)中使用电子通信定义吸入性炭疽的鉴别诊断的过程,并将结果与​​通过邮寄仪器从全国范围内家庭医生的随机样本中获得的结果进行了比较。 strong>方法我们通过电子邮件将调查仪器分发给了地区PBRN威斯康星研究网络(WReN)的55位医师。该仪器包括3例晕影,从11例吸入炭疽患者,2例A型流感患者和1例军团菌肺炎患者中随机抽取。医师提供了他们最可能的非炭疽诊断,以及他们对每种情况下对4个是或否管理问题的回答。在1周内未回复的医生会收到第二封关于调查仪器的电子邮件。比较组由完成邮寄调查工具的全国医师样本组成。主要结局指标为反应率,中位反应时间和分配给吸入性炭疽病例的诊断类别的频率。>结果 PBRN的反应率优于全国样本(47.3%对37.0%;相比之下)。 P =不重要)。 PBRN的中位响应时间明显短于国家样本的响应时间(2天比28天; P <.001)。在主要诊断类别或病例管理的频率上,PBRN和中西部样本的国家子集之间没有发现显着差异。>结论电子方法为国家具有重要意义的罕见传染病创建鉴别诊断是在PBRN内可行。信息的获取要快得多,并且与通过常规方法获得的信息一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号