首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied Psychological Measurement >Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance
【2h】

Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance

机译:跨组比较态度:基于IRT的项目拟合统计量度分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Questionnaires for the assessment of attitudes and other psychological traits are crucial in educational and psychological research, and item response theory (IRT) has become a viable tool for scaling such data. Many international large-scale assessments aim at comparing these constructs across countries, and the invariance of measures across countries is thus required. In its most recent cycle, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2015) implemented an innovative approach for testing the invariance of IRT-scaled constructs in the context questionnaires administered to students, parents, school principals, and teachers. On the basis of a concurrent calibration with equal item parameters across all groups (i.e., languages within countries), a group-specific item-fit statistic (root mean square deviance [RMSD]) was used as a measure for the invariance of item parameters for individual groups. The present simulation study examines the statistic’s distribution under different types and extents of (non)invariance in polytomous items. Responses to five 4-point Likert-type items were generated under the generalized partial credit model (GPCM) for 1,000 simulees in 50 groups each. For one of the five items, either location or discrimination parameters were drawn from a normal distribution. In addition to the type of noninvariance, the extent of noninvariance was varied by manipulating the variation of these distributions. The results indicate that the RMSD statistic is better at detecting noninvariance related to between-group differences in item location than in item discrimination. The study’s findings may be used as a starting point to sensitivity analysis aiming to define cutoff values for determining (non)invariance.
机译:评估态度和其他心理特征的问卷对于教育和心理学研究至关重要,项目反应理论(IRT)已成为缩放此类数据的可行工具。许多国际大规模评估旨在比较各国之间的结构,因此需要各国之间采取不变的措施。在最近的周期中,国际学生评估计划(PISA 2015)实施了一种创新方法,用于在对学生,家长,学校校长和老师进行的背景调查问卷中测试IRT规模的结构的不变性。在所有组(即国家/地区内的语言)中使用相同的项目参数进行并发校准的基础上,使用特定于组的项目拟合统计量(均方根偏差[RMSD])来衡量项目参数的不变性对于个人群体。当前的模拟研究检查了多变量项目在不同类型和程度(不变)不变下的统计量分布。在广义部分信用模型(GPCM)下,针对50个组中的1,000个模拟对象,生成了对五个4点Likert型项目的响应。对于这五个项目之一,从正态分布中得出位置或判别参数。除了不变性的类型外,不变性的程度还可以通过控制这些分布的变化来改变。结果表明,RMSD统计量在检测与项目位置之间的组间差异相关的不变性方面要好于项目判别。这项研究的发现可以用作敏感性分析的起点,旨在定义用于确定(非)不变性的临界值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号