首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition >Monitoring of end tidal carbon dioxide and transcutaneous carbon dioxide during neonatal transport
【2h】

Monitoring of end tidal carbon dioxide and transcutaneous carbon dioxide during neonatal transport

机译:监测新生儿运输期间的潮气末二氧化碳和经皮二氧化碳

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To assess the accuracy of measurements of end tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) during neonatal transport compared with arterial and transcutaneous measurements. >Design: Paired end tidal and transcutaneous CO2 recordings were taken frequently during road transport of 21 ventilated neonates. The first paired CO2 values were compared with an arterial blood gas. The differences between arterial CO2 (PaCO2), transcutaneous CO2 (TcPCO2), and end tidal CO2 (PetCO2) were analysed. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess bias and repeatability. >Results: PetCO2 correlated strongly with PaCO2 and TcPCO2. However, PetCO2 underestimated PaCO2 at a clinically unacceptable level (mean (SD) 1.1 (0.70) kPa) and did not trend reliably over time within individual subjects. The PetCO2 bias was independent of PaCO2 and severity of lung disease. >Conclusions: PetCO2 had an unacceptable under-recording bias. TcPCO2 should currently be considered the preferred method of non-invasive CO2 monitoring for neonatal transport.
机译:>目的:与动脉和经皮测量相比,评估新生儿运输过程中潮气中二氧化碳(CO2)的测量准确性。 >设计:在21名通风新生儿的公路运输过程中,经常采集潮汐和经皮CO2配对记录。将第一个配对的CO2值与动脉血气进行比较。分析了动脉CO2(PaCO2),经皮CO2(TcPCO2)和潮气末CO2(PetCO2)之间的差异。 Bland-Altman方法用于评估偏差和重复性。 >结果:PetCO2与PaCO2和TcPCO2密切相关。但是,PetCO2在临床上不可接受的水平上低估了PaCO2(平均(SD)1.1(0.70)kPa),并且在个体受试者中没有随时间可靠地趋势。 PetCO2偏倚与PaCO2和肺部疾病的严重程度无关。 >结论:PetCO 2 的录制不足偏向是不可接受的。目前应将TcPCO 2 视为非侵入性CO 2 新生儿运输监测的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号