首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Arrhythmia Electrophysiology Review >Classification Electrophysiological Features and Therapy of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
【2h】

Classification Electrophysiological Features and Therapy of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

机译:房室结折返性心动过速的分类电生理特征和治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) should be classified as typical or atypical. The term ‘fast-slow AVNRT’ is rather misleading. Retrograde atrial activation during tachycardia should not be relied upon as a diagnostic criterion. Both typical and atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia are compatible with varying retrograde atrial activation patterns. Attempts at establishing the presence of a ‘lower common pathway’ are probably of no practical significance. When the diagnosis of AVNRT is established, ablation should be only directed towards the anatomic position of the slow pathway. If right septal attempts are unsuccessful, the left septal side should be tried. Ablation targeting earliest atrial activation sites during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia or the fast pathway in general for any kind of typical or atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, are not justified. In this review we discuss current concepts about the tachycardia circuit, electrophysiologic diagnosis, and ablation of this arrhythmia.
机译:房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)应分类为典型性或非典型性。 “慢速AVNRT”一词颇具误导性。心动过速期间房性逆行激活不应作为诊断标准。典型的和非典型的房室结折返性心动过速都与各种逆行性心房激活模式兼容。尝试建立“较低共同路径”的存在可能没有实际意义。建立AVNRT的诊断后,消融应仅针对慢路的解剖位置。如果右中隔尝试不成功,则应尝试左中隔。在典型的房室结折返性心动过速或通常针对任何一种典型的或非典型的房室结折返性心动过速的快速途径中靶向最早的心房激活部位的消融是不合理的。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了有关心动过速回路,电生理诊断和这种心律失常消融的最新概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号