首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Stem Cell Reports >Tracing Dynamics and Clonal Heterogeneity of Cbx7-Induced Leukemic Stem Cells by Cellular Barcoding
【2h】

Tracing Dynamics and Clonal Heterogeneity of Cbx7-Induced Leukemic Stem Cells by Cellular Barcoding

机译:通过细胞条形码追踪Cbx7诱导的白血病干细胞的动力学和克隆异质性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="head no_bottom_margin" id="sec1title">IntroductionLeukemias are proliferative diseases that arise from HSCs or progenitors that fail to obey the regulatory signals that normally restrict their self-renewal and direct differentiation. Sequential “linear” acquisition of mutations in tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes has long been thought to drive leukemogenesis, as postulated in the original clonal evolution hypothesis (). However, the use of advanced genomic techniques to investigate clonal diversity and evolution now shows that tumors are often organized in a nonlinear, branching hierarchy ().It had been shown that only a subfraction of cells within the leukemic cell population, termed leukemic stem cells (LSCs), possesses the ability to initiate and sustain disease (). Early publications demonstrating heterogeneity within the LSC population utilized the detection of viral integration sites after transduction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells and showed that human LSCs differ in their self-renewal capacities after transplantation in immunodeficient mice (). However, it has recently been reported that xenotransplantation might not always reflect subclonal heterogeneity in patients’ leukemia due to species-specific selective pressures ().Later approaches employed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to monitor translocations and copy number alterations to investigate genetic heterogeneity within pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (). However, the resolution of this FISH-based method to identify heterogeneity and subclonal origin is limited. Deep sequencing genomic DNA or RNA (exome sequencing) of malignant cells from patients provides the highest possible resolution for identification of mutations or other genetic abnormalities within a tumor. Such attempts have recently been made in leukemic patients (). Although potentially very powerful, it is difficult to define (sub)clones based on a large set of genomic data from a pool of genetically diverse cells (), and it requires complex computational approaches and multiple assumptions. For example, the assumption that a certain mutation occurs only once and therefore represents a stable “unique mark” is often made. However, genomes of cancers are generally unstable, and the same mutation may have occurred twice. Another assumption is that the allelic frequency with which a particular mutation occurs depends on the time point of its origin. However, this does not always have to be the case, as primitive LSCs might actually be dormant. In addition, it remains difficult to distinguish which genetic abnormalities are causal to disease progression and which are functionally neutral passenger mutations ().Although previous studies begin to recognize the potential complex genetic architecture of leukemia, unambiguous longitudinal detection of leukemic clones remains difficult to achieve. Ideally, clones should be prospectively defined by unique labeling of cells before tumor initiation, and detection of different clones should be performed at high resolution. A recently described method, which would potentially accomplish this, is the marking of cells by the introduction of a unique, heritable mark that can be detected in its offspring experimentally (). These methods rely on the viral integration of a random “barcode” sequence of fixed length in the genome of target cells. After transplantation of barcoded cells, their offspring can be traced by quantifying the abundance of unique barcodes using deep sequencing.Previously, we have shown that overexpression of the Polycomb PRC1 member Cbx7 in bone marrow cells causes leukemia (). While typically a single oncogene causes one specific tumor type, the epigenetic modifier CBX7 causes a wide spectrum of leukemias, including T-ALL, erythroid, and undifferentiated leukemias. Since only long-term hematopoietic stems cells (LT-HSCs), short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs), and multipotent progenitors (MPPs), but not lineage-restricted progenitors are responsive to Cbx7 overexpression (), the different types of leukemias are not likely to depend on the cell of origin in which Cbx7 is overexpressed. Rather, the phenotypic variation seems to be an inherent virtue of CBX7.In the present paper, we have generated a mouse model in which overexpression of Cbx7 serves as the initial leukemic “hit” and every pre-LSC is uniquely labeled by a barcode. We show how our approach allows for the identification of LSC-derived clones in the transplanted primary and secondary recipients. We prospectively describe clonal dynamics in mice that succumb to leukemia and highlight the complexity of clonal evolution.
机译:<!-fig ft0-> <!-fig @ position =“ anchor” mode =文章f4-> <!-fig mode =“ anchred” f5-> <!-fig / graphic | fig / alternatives / graphic mode =“ anchored” m1-> class =“ head no_bottom_margin” id =“ sec1title”>简介白血病是由HSC或祖细胞引起的增生性疾病,它们不遵守监管信号通常限制他们的自我更新和直接分化。长期以来,人们一直认为按顺序的“线性”获取肿瘤抑制基因或癌基因的突变会导致白血病的发生,正如最初的克隆进化假说所假定的那样。然而,利用先进的基因组学技术研究克隆多样性和进化过程表明,肿瘤通常以非线性的分支层次组织(),这表明白血病细胞群中只有一部分亚细胞被称为白血病干细胞。 (LSC),具有引发和维持疾病的能力()。证明LSC群体异质性的早期出版物利用转导急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)细胞后病毒整合位点的检测,并表明人LSC在免疫缺陷小鼠中移植后的自我更新能力有所不同。然而,最近有报道称,由于物种特异性的选择压力,异种移植可能并不总是反映患者白血病中的亚克隆异质性。(后来的方法采用荧光原位杂交(FISH)来监测易位和拷贝数变化以研究遗传异质性小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)()。但是,这种基于FISH的方法识别异质性和亚克隆来源的分辨率受到限制。对患者恶性细胞的基因组DNA或RNA进行深度测序可为鉴定肿瘤内的突变或其他遗传异常提供最高的分辨率。最近在白血病患者中进行了这样的尝试。尽管可能非常强大,但是很难根据来自遗传多样性细胞池的大量基因组数据来定义(亚)克隆,并且它需要复杂的计算方法和多种假设。例如,经常做出这样的假设:某个突变仅发生一次,因此代表一个稳定的“唯一标记”。但是,癌症的基因组通常不稳定,并且相同的突变可能发生了两次。另一个假设是,发生特定突变的等位基因频率取决于其起源的时间点。但是,并非总是如此,因为原始LSC实际上可能处于休眠状态。此外,仍然难以区分哪些遗传异常是疾病进展的原因,哪些是功能上中性的客运突变()。尽管先前的研究已开始认识到白血病的潜在复杂遗传结构,但仍难以实现对白血病克隆的明确纵向检测。理想情况下,应该在肿瘤发生之前通过对细胞进行独特的标记来对克隆进行前瞻性定义,并且应该以高分辨率进行不同克隆的检测。最近描述的一种可能会实现此目的的方法是通过引入独特的,可遗传的标记来标记细胞,该标记可通过实验在其后代中检测到。这些方法依赖于靶细胞基因组中固定长度的随机“条形码”序列的病毒整合。条形码细胞移植后,可以通过深度测序定量独特条形码的数量来追踪它们的后代。以前,我们已经证明Polycomb PRC1成员Cbx7在骨髓细胞中的过表达会导致白血病()。尽管通常单个癌基因会引起一种特定的肿瘤类型,但表观遗传修饰剂CBX7会引起多种白血病,包括T-ALL,类红血球和未分化的白血病。由于仅长期造血干细胞(LT-HSC),短期造血干细胞(ST-HSC)和多能祖细胞(MPP)而非谱系受限祖细胞对Cbx7过度表达有反应(),因此不同类型的白血病它们不太可能依赖于Cbx7过表达的起源细胞。而是,表型变异似乎是CBX7的固有优势。在本文中,我们生成了一个小鼠模型,其中Cbx7的过表达充当初始白血病“命中”,并且每个pre-LSC均由条形码唯一标记。我们展示了我们的方法如何在移植的主要和次要受体中鉴定LSC衍生的克隆。我们前瞻性描述了屈服于白血病的小鼠中的克隆动力学,并强调了克隆进化的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号