首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care >Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation in Pediatric Critical Care: In-Bed Mobilization in Critically Ill Children: A Safety and Feasibility Trial
【2h】

Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation in Pediatric Critical Care: In-Bed Mobilization in Critically Ill Children: A Safety and Feasibility Trial

机译:儿科重症监护室的物理治疗和康复:重症儿童的床内动员:安全性和可行性试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing two methods of in-bed mobilization in critically ill children. This prospective cohort trial was conducted at McMaster Children's Hospital, Pediatric Critical Care Unit (PCCU). Hemodynamically stable patients aged 3 to 17 years with a longer than 24-hour PCCU stay were eligible to participate in the study. Children with cardiorespiratory instability, already mobilizing well or at their baseline mobility, anticipated death during this PCCU admission, and those with contraindications to mobilization were excluded. Two methods of mobilization were applied for a maximum of 2 days, respectively, depending on the level of consciousness and cognitive ability of the participant. In-bed cycling was used for passive mobilization and interactive video games (VG) were used for active mobilization. The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility. Secondary outcomes were physical activity during the study period, as reflected by accelerometer measurements. A total of 406 patients were screened over 1 year, 35 of who were eligible and 31 (89%) consented to participate. Median age of participants was 11 years (quartile 1 is 6 years and quartile 3 is 14 years), and 15 (48%) were male. Twenty-five (81%) participants received the study intervention, 22 (88%) of who received the intervention within 24 hours of consent. Twenty-one (84%) participants received in-bed cycling, five (20%) received VG, and only one received both. Fifteen (60%) completed the prescribed 2-day intervention, while in 11 (44%) the intervention was interrupted or not applied, most commonly because the patient was transferred out of the PCCU. Physical activity was greater during the intervention compared with nonintervention times with in-bed cycling, but not with VG. There were no adverse events attributable to the intervention. This pilot reveals that in-bed cycling can enhance physical activity, and appears to be safe and feasible in this group of critically ill children. VG was feasible only in a minority of patients who were cooperative and age appropriate. Further research is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and most appropriate methods of enhancing mobility and rehabilitation in this population.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在危重儿童中实施两种床内动员方法的可行性和安全性。这项前瞻性队列研究在儿科重症监护病房(MCU)麦克马斯特儿童医院进行。血液动力学稳定的患者,年龄3至17岁,PCCU停留时间超过24小时,可以参加研究。心肺不稳的儿童,已经动员良好或处于基线活动能力,在接受PCCU期间预期死亡,以及有动员禁忌症的儿童被排除在外。取决于参与者的意识水平和认知能力,两种动员方法分别最多使用2天。卧式自行车用于被动动员,交互式视频游戏(VG)用于主动动员。主要结果是安全性和可行性。次要结果是研究期间的身体活动,如加速度计的测量结果所反映。在1年内对406例患者进行了筛查,其中35例符合条件,31例(89%)同意参加。参与者的中位年龄为11岁(四分之一为6岁,四分之三为14岁),男性为15岁(占48%)。二十五(81%)名参与者接受了研究干预,其中22名(88%)在同意后24小时内接受了干预。 21名(84%)参与者接受了床内自行车,五名(20%)接受了VG,只有一名接受了两次。 15名(60%)完成了为期2天的处方治疗,而11名(44%)完成了干预或不进行干预,通常是因为患者被转出了PCCU。与非介入式卧床骑行相比,干预期间的体力活动更大,但VG则没有。没有可归因于干预的不良事件。这位飞行员揭示,在床上骑自行车可以增强体育锻炼,并且在这组重症儿童中似乎是安全可行的。 VG仅在少数合作且年龄合适的患者中可行。有必要进行进一步的研究以评估该人群的功效和最有效的方法,以增强他们的活动能力和康复能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号