首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >The evaluating self-management and educational support in severely obese patients awaiting multidisciplinary bariatric care (EVOLUTION) trial: rationale and design
【2h】

The evaluating self-management and educational support in severely obese patients awaiting multidisciplinary bariatric care (EVOLUTION) trial: rationale and design

机译:等待重症肥胖症治疗(EVOLUTION)试验的严重肥胖患者的自我管理和教育支持评估:原理和设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn Canada, demand for multidisciplinary bariatric (obesity) care far outstrips capacity. Consequently, prolonged wait times exist and contribute to substantial health impairments.A supportive, educational intervention (with in-person and web-based versions) designed to enhance the self-management skills of patients wait-listed for multidisciplinary bariatric medical and surgical care has been variably implemented across Alberta, Canada. However, its effectiveness has not been evaluated. Our objectives were: 1. To determine if this program improves clinical and humanistic outcomes and is cost-effective compared to a control intervention; and 2. To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of in-person group-based versus web-based care. We hypothesize that both the web-based and in-person programs will reduce body weight and improve outcomes compared to the control group. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the in-person version will be more effective but more costly than the web-based version.
机译:背景技术在加拿大,对多学科减肥治疗(肥胖症)的需求远远超过了容量。因此,等待时间延长并严重损害健康。支持性的教育干预措施(面对面和基于网络的干预措施)旨在增强等待入院的多学科减肥医学和手术治疗患者的自我管理技能在加拿大艾伯塔省的实施情况有所不同。但是,其有效性尚未评估。我们的目标是:1.确定该计划是否改善临床和人文结果,并且与控制干预措施相比具有成本效益; 2.比较基于团体的个人护理与基于网络的护理的有效性和成本效益。我们假设与对照组相比,基于网络的程序和面对面程序都将减轻体重并改善结局。此外,我们假设面对面的版本比基于Web的版本更有效,但成本更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号