首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >Are community-living and institutionalized dementia patients cared for differently? Evidence on service utilization and costs of care from German insurance claims data
【2h】

Are community-living and institutionalized dementia patients cared for differently? Evidence on service utilization and costs of care from German insurance claims data

机译:社区生活和机构性痴呆患者的照护方式是否有所不同?来自德国保险理赔数据的服务利用和护理成本证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundDementia patients are often cared for in institutional arrangements, which are associated with substantial spending on professional long-term care services. Nevertheless, there is little evidence on the exact cost differences between community-based and institutional dementia care, especially when it comes to the distinct health care services. Adopting the perspective of the German social security system, which combines Statutory Health Insurance and Compulsory Long-Term Care Insurance (payer perspective), our study aimed to compare community-living and institutionalized dementia patients regarding their health care service utilization profiles and to contrast the respective expenditures.
机译:背景老年痴呆症患者通常在机构安排中得到照顾,这与专业长期护理服务的大量支出有关。然而,几乎没有证据表明社区痴呆和机构性痴呆之间的确切费用差异,特别是涉及独特的保健服务时。我们的研究采用德国社会保障体系的观点,将法定健康保险和强制性长期护理保险相结合(付款人观点),我们的研究旨在比较社区居住和制度化痴呆患者的医疗保健服务利用状况,并与之进行对比。各自的支出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号