首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Protocol for an economic evaluation of the randomised controlled trial of culprit lesion only PCI versus immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: CULPRIT-SHOCK trial
【2h】

Protocol for an economic evaluation of the randomised controlled trial of culprit lesion only PCI versus immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

机译:经济评估方案对急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的仅罪犯病变PCI与直接多支血管PCI进行随机对照试验:CULPRIT-SHOCK试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionEmergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion for patients with acute myocardial infarctions is an accepted practice. A majority of patients present with multivessel disease with additional relevant stenoses apart from the culprit lesion. In haemodynamically stable patients, there is increasing evidence from randomised trials to support the practice of immediate complete revascularisation. However, in the presence of cardiogenic shock, the optimal management strategy for additional non-culprit lesions is unknown. A multicentre randomised controlled trial, CULPRIT-SHOCK, is examining whether culprit vessel only PCI with potentially subsequent staged revascularisation is more effective than immediate multivessel PCI. This paper describes the intended economic evaluation of the trial.
机译:简介急性心肌梗死患者的急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是一种公认​​的做法。大多数患者患有多支血管疾病,除了罪魁祸首外,还有其他相关的狭窄。在血液动力学稳定的患者中,越来越多的随机试验证据支持立即完全血运重建。但是,在存在心源性休克的情况下,尚无其他非罪犯病变的最佳治疗策略。一项多中心随机对照试验,CULPRIT-SHOCK,正在研究仅伴有随后分阶段血运重建的仅罪犯血管的PCI是否比即刻多支血管PCI更有效。本文介绍了该试验的预期经济评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号