首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Endoscopy >Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review

机译:内镜超声引导胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Surgery remains the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis except in high-risk candidates where percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD), endoscopic transpapillary cystic duct stenting (ET-CDS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are potential choices. PT-GBD is contraindicated in patients with coagulopathy or ascites and is not preferred by patients owing to aesthetic reasons. ET-CDS is successful only if the cystic duct can be visualized and cannulated. For 189 patients who underwent EUS-GBD via insertion of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), the composite technical success rate was 95.2%, which increased to 96.8% when LAMS was combined with co-axial self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The composite clinical success rate was 96.7%. We observed a small risk of recurrent cholecystitis (5.1%), gastrointestinal bleeding (2.6%) and stent migration (1.1%). Cautery enhanced LAMS significantly decreases the stent deployment time compared to non-cautery enhanced LAMS. Prophylactic placement of a pigtail stent or SEMS through the LAMS avoids re-interventions, particularly in patients, where it is intended to remain in situ indefinitely. Limited evidence suggests that the efficacy of EUS-GBD via LAMS is comparable to that of PT-GBD with the former showing better results in postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, and need for antibiotics. EUS-GBD via LAMS is a safe and efficacious option when performed by experts.
机译:外科手术仍然是急性胆囊炎的标准治疗方法,但对于高危患者,有可能进行经皮经肝穿刺胆囊引流术(PT-GBD),内镜经乳头状胆囊管支架置入术(ET-CDS)和内镜超声引导胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)选择。 PT-GBD在患有凝血病或腹水的患者中是禁忌的,由于美学原因,患者不宜使用。 ET-CDS仅在可以可视化和插管胆囊管的情况下才能成功。对于通过插入腔内金属支架(LAMS)进行EUS-GBD的189例患者,复合技术成功率为95.2%,当LAMS与同轴自扩张金属支架(SEMS)结合使用时,复合技术成功率提高到96.8%。 )。综合临床成功率为96.7%。我们观察到复发性胆囊炎(5.1%),胃肠道出血(2.6%)和支架迁移(1.1%)的风险很小。与非电灼增强型LAMS相比,谨慎增强型LAMS显着减少了支架部署时间。通过LAMS预防性放置猪尾支架或SEMS可以避免再次干预,尤其是对于打算无限期保留在原位的患者。有限的证据表明,通过LAMS进行EUS-GBD的疗效与PT-GBD相当,前者在术后疼痛,住院时间和对抗生素的需求方面显示出更好的效果。当由专家执行时,通过LAMS进行EUS-GBD是一种安全有效的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号