首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Midterm to Long-term Followup of Staged Reimplantation for Infected Hip Arthroplasty
【2h】

Midterm to Long-term Followup of Staged Reimplantation for Infected Hip Arthroplasty

机译:髋关节置换术分期再植入的中期至长期随访

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most reports on two-stage reimplantation have focused on the short-term cure rate of infection, but little is known about long-term reinfection-free survival or mechanical durability. We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients (169 hips) with infected arthroplasty, all of whom had two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of an infected total hip arthroplasty between 1988 and 1998. In the second stage, the femoral component was fixed with antibiotic-loaded bone cement in 121 hips; the remaining femoral components and all acetabular components were uncemented. The minimum followup time was 2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 2–16 years). At most recent followup, 12 hips (7.1%) were reoperated on for reinfection and 13 hips (7.7%) were revised for aseptic loosening or osteolysis. Apparently aseptic loosening occurred on one or both sides of the joint in 24 hips (14.2%). The 10-year survivals free of reinfection and mechanical failure were 87.5% and 75.2% respectively. Nineteen hips dislocated and eight underwent revision surgery for instability. The method of femoral component fixation, either with or without cement, did not correlate with risk of infection, loosening, or mechanical failure. Based on these results, the method of fixation used for the femoral component during two-stage reimplantation surgery should be based on the surgeon’s preference for fixation combined with the assessment of femoral bone stock.>Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:关于两阶段再植入的大多数报道都集中在感染的短期治愈率上,但是对于无再感染的长期生存或机械耐久性知之甚少。我们回顾性分析了168例(169髋)感染性人工关节置换术,所有患者均于1988年至1998年间接受了两阶段的再植入术,以治疗感染性全髋关节置换术。在第二阶段,股骨组件采用抗生素加载的骨固定121髋骨水泥;其余股骨成分和所有髋臼成分均未粘固。最小随访时间为2年(平均7年;范围2-16年)。在最近的随访中,再次手术12髋(7.1%)进行再次感染,而13髋(7.7%)进行了无菌松动或溶骨手术。显然,在24髋关节的一侧或两侧发生了无菌性松动(14.2%)。无再感染和机械衰竭的10年生存率分别为87.5%和75.2%。 19例髋关节脱位,8例因不稳而接受翻修手术。不论是否使用骨水泥,股骨组件固定方法均与感染,松弛或机械衰竭的风险无关。基于这些结果,在两阶段再植手术中用于股骨组件的固定方法应基于外科医生对固定的偏好以及对股骨骨量的评估。>证据水平:水平四,案例系列。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号