首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Getting to Equal: Strategies to Understand and Eliminate General and Orthopaedic Healthcare Disparities
【2h】

Getting to Equal: Strategies to Understand and Eliminate General and Orthopaedic Healthcare Disparities

机译:平等:理解和消除普通和骨科医疗保健差异的策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The 2001 Institute of Medicine report entitled Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care pointed out extensive healthcare disparities in the United States even when controlling for disease severity, socioeconomic status, education, and access. The literature identifies several groups of Americans who receive disparate healthcare: ethnic minorities, women, children, the elderly, the handicapped, the poor, prisoners, lesbians, gays, and the transgender population. Disparate healthcare represents an enormous current challenge with substantial moral, ethical, political, public health, public policy, and economic implications, all of which are likely to worsen over the next several decades without immediate and comprehensive action. A review of recent literature reveals over 100 general and specific suggestions and solutions to eliminate healthcare disparities. While healthcare disparities have roots in multiple sources, racial stereotypes and biases remain a major contributing factor and are prototypical of biases based on age, physical handicap, socioeconomic status, religion, sexual orientation or other differences. Given that such disparities have a strong basis in racial biases, and that the principles of racism are similar to those of other “isms”, we summarize the current state of healthcare disparities, the goals of their eradication, and the various potential solutions from a conceptual model of racism affecting patients (internalized racism), caregivers (personally mediated racism), and society (institutionalized racism).
机译:2001年医学研究所的报告题为“不平等待遇:在医疗保健中面对种族和族裔差距”指出,即使控制疾病的严重程度,社会经济地位,教育程度和获得机会,美国的医疗保健差距也很大。文献确定了接受不同医疗保健的几类美国人:少数民族,妇女,儿童,老人,残疾人,穷人,囚犯,女同性恋者,男同性恋者和变性人群。不同的医疗保健构成了巨大的当前挑战,具有重大的道德,伦理,政治,公共卫生,公共政策和经济影响,如果不立即采取全面行动,所有这些都会在未来几十年内恶化。对最新文献的回顾揭示了100多种常规和特定建议和解决方案,以消除医疗保健差异。尽管医疗保健差异源于多种原因,但种族成见和偏见仍然是主要的影响因素,并且是基于年龄,身体残障,社会经济地位,宗教,性取向或其他差异的偏见的典型代表。鉴于此类差异是种族偏见的有力基础,种族主义的原则与其他“主义”的原则相似,因此,我们总结了医疗保健差异的现状,消除这些差异的目标以及各种潜在的解决方案。影响患者的种族主义概念模型(内部种族主义),照顾者(个人介导的种族主义)和社会(制度化种族主义)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号