首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Acute and Post-Exercise Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training in Endurance and Sprint Athletes
【2h】

Acute and Post-Exercise Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training in Endurance and Sprint Athletes

机译:耐力和冲刺运动员对高强度间歇训练的急性和运动后生理反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the presented study was to compare acute and post-exercise differences in cardiorespiratory, metabolic, cardiac autonomic, inflammatory and muscle damage responses to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIT) between endurance and sprint athletes. The study group consisted of sixteen highly-trained males (age 22.1 ± 2.5 years) participating in endurance (n = 8) or sprint (n = 8) sporting events. All the participants underwent three exercise sessions: short HIIT (work interval duration 30s), long HIIT (3min) and constant load exercise (CE). The exercise interventions were matched for mean power, total time and in case of HIIT interventions also for work-to-relief ratio. The acute cardiorespiratory (HR, V̇O2, RER) and metabolic (lactate) variables as well as the post-exercise changes (up to 3 h) in the heart rate variability, inflammation (interleukin-6, leucocytes) and muscle damage (creatine kinase, myoglobin) were monitored. Endurance athletes performed exercise interventions with moderately (CE) or largely (both HIIT modes) higher mean V̇O2. These differences were trivial/small when V̇O2 was expressed as a percentage of V̇O2max. Moderately to largely lower RER and lactate values were found in endurance athletes. Markers of cardiac autonomic regulation, inflammation and muscle damage did not reveal any considerable differences between endurance and sprint athletes. In conclusions, endurance athletes were able to perform both HIIT formats with increased reliance on aerobic metabolic pathways although exercise intensity was identical in relative terms for all the participants. However, other markers of the acute and early post-exercise physiological response to these HIIT interventions indicated similarities between endurance and sprint athletes.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The manner in which each training background (endurance vs. sprint) influences the response to HIIT is not well known.Despite the identical exercise intensity in relative terms, endurance athletes are able to perform HIIT with increased reliance on aerobic metabolic pathways when compared to sprint athletes.The mean V̇O2 (% V̇O2max) and HR as well as markers of the cardiac autonomic regulation, systemic inflammation and muscle damage monitored during the early recovery phase did not demonstrate any differences between endurance and sprint trained individuals.
机译:本研究的目的是比较耐力和冲刺运动员在高强度间歇运动(HIIT)方面的心肺,代谢,心脏自主神经,炎症和肌肉损伤反应的急性和运动后差异。该研究组由16名经过严格训练的男性(年龄22.1±2.5岁)参加耐力(n = 8)或冲刺(n = 8)运动项目。所有参加者都进行了三个运动训练:短HIIT(工作间隔持续时间30s),长HIIT(3分钟)和恒定负荷运动(CE)。锻炼干预措施的平均功率,总时间和HIIT干预措施的工作与缓解比例也要匹配。急性心肺(HR,V̇O2,RER)和代谢(乳酸)变量,以及运动后心率变异性,炎症(白介素6,白细胞)和肌肉损伤(肌酸激酶)的变化(最长3小时) (肌红蛋白)进行监测。耐力运动员以中等(CE)或很大程度上(两种HIIT模式)的平均V̇O2进行运动干预。当V = O2表示为V = O2max的百分比时,这些差异很小/很小。在耐力运动员中发现RER和乳酸值适度降低。心脏自主神经调节,炎症和肌肉损伤的指标并未显示出耐力和冲刺运动员之间的任何显着差异。总之,尽管所有参与者的运动强度在相对方面都是相同的,但是耐力运动员能够执行两种HIIT格式,并且增加了对有氧代谢途径的依赖。但是,对这些HIIT干预的急性和早期运动后生理反应的其他指标表明,耐力和冲刺运动员之间存在相似之处。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!- -list-behavior =无序前缀= word-mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 每种训练背景(耐力与冲刺)影响HIIT响应的方式尚不清楚 尽管相对强度的运动强度相同,但耐力运动员与短跑运动员相比,能够进行HIIT并更多地依赖有氧代谢途径。 平均V̇O2(%V̇O2max) )和HR,以及在恢复的早期阶段监测的心脏自主调节,全身性炎症和肌肉损伤的指标,并未显示耐力和冲刺训练的个体之间有任何差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号