首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice
【2h】

Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice

机译:在临床实践中报告分段肠准备分数在结肠镜检查中的重要性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the impact of reporting bowel preparation using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) in clinical practice.METHODS: The study was a prospective observational cohort study which enrolled subjects reporting for screening colonoscopy. All subjects received a gallon of polyethylene glycol as bowel preparation regimen. After colonoscopy the endoscopists determined quality of bowel preparation using BBPS. Segmental scores were combined to calculate composite BBPS. Site and size of the polyps detected was recorded. Pathology reports were reviewed to determine advanced adenoma detection rates (AADR). Segmental AADR’s were calculated and categorized based on the segmental BBPS to determine the differential impact of bowel prep on AADR.RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty subjects were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 59.2 years, 36.3% males and 63.8% females. Four subjects with incomplete colonoscopy due BBPS of 0 in any segment were excluded. Based on composite BBPS subjects were divided into 3 groups; Group-0 (poor bowel prep, BBPS 0-3) n = 26 (7.3%), Group-1 (Suboptimal bowel prep, BBPS 4-6) n = 121 (34%) and Group-2 (Adequate bowel prep, BBPS 7-9) n = 209 (58.7%). AADR showed a linear trend through Group-1 to 3; with an AADR of 3.8%, 14.8% and 16.7% respectively. Also seen was a linear increasing trend in segmental AADR with improvement in segmental BBPS. There was statistical significant difference between AADR among Group 0 and 2 (3.8% vs 16.7%, P < 0.05), Group 1 and 2 (14.8% vs 16.7%, P < 0.05) and Group 0 and 1 (3.8% vs 14.8%, P < 0.05). χ2 method was used to compute P value for determining statistical significance.CONCLUSION: Segmental AADRs correlate with segmental BBPS. It is thus valuable to report segmental BBPS in colonoscopy reports in clinical practice.
机译:目的:评估使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)报告肠道准备的临床实践方法。方法:该研究是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,纳入报告结肠镜检查的受试者。所有受试者均接受一加仑的聚乙二醇作为肠准备方案。结肠镜检查后,内镜医师使用BBPS确定肠准备的质量。结合分段得分来计算复合BBPS。记录检测到的息肉的部位和大小。审查病理报告以确定晚期腺瘤检出率(AADR)。根据分段BBPS对分段AADR进行了计算和分类,以确定肠道准备对ADR的不同影响。结果:纳入研究的360名受试者,平均年龄为59.2岁,男性为36.3%,女性为63.8%。排除了在任何段中由于BBPS为0而导致结肠镜检查不完全的四名受试者。根据综合BBPS,将受试者分为3组。第0组(肠准备不佳,BBPS 0-3)n = 26(7.3%),第1组(肠准备不佳,BBPS 4-6)n = 121(34%)和第2组(充分肠准备, BBPS 7-9)n = 209(58.7%)。 AADR在第1组到第3组之间显示线性趋势; AADR分别为3.8%,14.8%和16.7%。还可以看出节段AADR呈线性增加趋势,节段BBPS有所改善。第0组和第2组的AADR之间存在统计学差异(3.8%vs. 16.7%,P <0.05),第1组和第2组(14.8%vs 16.7%,P <0.05)和第0和1组(3.8%vs 14.8%) ,P <0.05)。结论采用χ 2 方法计算P值,具有统计学意义。结论:节段AADR与节段BBPS相关。因此,在临床实践中在结肠镜检查报告中报告分段BBPS是有价值的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号