首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Remains of the day: Biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
【2h】

Remains of the day: Biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译:每天的活动:与单端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术有关的胆道并发症

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To assesse the rate of bile duct injuries (BDI) and overall biliary complications during single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).METHODS: SPLC has recently been proposed as an innovative surgical approach for gallbladder surgery. So far, its safety with respect to bile duct injuries has not been specifically evaluated. A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and November 2012 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing SPLC versus CLC reporting BDI rate and overall biliary complications were included. The quality of RCT was assessed using the Jadad score. Analysis was made by performing a meta-analysis, using Review Manager 5.2. This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A retrospective study including all retrospective reports on SPLC was also performed alongside.RESULTS: From 496 publications, 11 RCT including 898 patients were selected for meta-analysis. No studies were rated as high quality (Jadad score ≥ 4). Operative indications included benign gallbladder disease operated in an elective setting in all studies, excluding all emergency cases and acute cholecystitis. The median follow-up was 1 mo (range 0.03-18 mo). The incidence of BDI was 0.4% for SPLC and 0% for CLC; the difference was not statistically different (P = 0.36). The incidence of overall biliary complication was 1.6% for SPLC and 0.5% for CLC, the difference did not reached statistically significance (P = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.66-15). Sixty non-randomized trials including 3599 patients were also analysed. The incidence of BDI reported then was 0.7%.CONCLUSION: The safety of SPLC cannot be assumed, based on the current evidence. Hence, this new technology cannot be recommended as standard technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
机译:目的:与传统的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)相比,为了评估单端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SPLC)的胆管损伤率(BDI)和总体胆道并发症。方法:最近,SPLC被提出作为胆囊手术的一种创新手术方法。到目前为止,还没有专门评估其在胆管损伤方面的安全性。对1990年1月至2012年11月之间发表的文献进行了系统回顾。包括比较SPLC和CLC报告BDI率和总体胆道并发症的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Jadad评分评估RCT的质量。使用Review Manager 5.2通过执行荟萃分析进行分析。本研究基于系统评价的首选报告项目和Meta分析指南。结果:从496篇出版物中,选择11项RCT包括898例患者进行荟萃分析。没有研究被评为高质量(Jadad评分≥4)。手术适应症包括在所有研究中均以选择性治疗的良性胆囊疾病,但不包括所有急诊病例和急性胆囊炎。中位随访时间为1 mo(范围为0.03-18 mo)。 SPLC的BDI发生率为0.4%,CLC的BDI发生率为0%;差异无统计学差异(P = 0.36)。 SPLC的总胆道并发症发生率为1.6%,CLC的总胆道并发症发生率为0.5%,差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.21,95%CI:0.66-15)。还分析了60项非随机试验,包括3599例患者。当时报道的BDI发生率为0.7%。结论:根据现有证据,不能假定SPLC的安全性。因此,不能推荐将该新技术作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术的标准技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号