首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: Comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography spiral CT and MRI
【2h】

Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: Comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography spiral CT and MRI

机译:食管癌的术前TN分期:微型探头超声检查螺旋CT和MRI的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the value of miniprobe sonography (MPS), spiral CT and MR imaging (MRI) in the tumor and regional lymph node staging of esophageal cancer.METHODS: Eight-six patients (56 men and 30 women; age range of 39-73 years, mean 62 years) with esophageal carcinoma were staged preoperatively with imaging modalities. Of them, 81 (94%) had squamous cell carcinoma, 4 (5%) adenocarcinoma, and 1 (1%) adenoacanthoma. Eleven patients (12%) had malignancy of the upper one third, 41 (48%) of the mid-esophagus and 34 (40%) of the distal one third. Forty-one were examined by spiral CT in whom 13 were co-examined by MPS, and forty-five by MRI in whom 18 were also co-examined by MPS. These imaging results were compared with the findings of the histopathologic examination for resected specimens.RESULTS: In staging the depth of tumor growth, MPS was significantly more accurate (84%) than spiral CT and MRI (68% and 60%, respectively, P < 0.05). The specificity and sensitivity were 82% and 85% for MPS; 60% and 69% for spiral CT; and 40% and 63% for MRI, respectively. In staging regional lymph nodes, spiral CT was more accurate (78%) than MPS and MRI (71% and 64%, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant. The specificity and sensitivity were 79% and 77% for spiral CT; 75% and 68% for MPS; and 68% and 62% for MRI, respectively.CONCLUSION: MPS is superior to spiral CT or MRI for T staging, especially in early esophageal cancer. However, the three modalities have the similar accuracy in N staging. Spiral CT or MRI is helpful for the detection of far-distance metastasis in esophageal cancer.
机译:目的:评估微型探针超声检查(MPS),螺旋CT和MR成像(MRI)在食管癌的肿瘤和局部淋巴结分期中的价值。方法:八十六例患者(56例男性和30例女性;年龄39岁) -73岁,平均62岁),术前采用影像学方法分期。其中81例(94%)患有鳞状细胞癌,4例(5%)腺癌和1例(1%)腺腺癌。 11例(12%)患上三分之一的恶性肿瘤,41例(48%)食管中段,34例(40%)远端三分之一。通过螺旋CT检查了41例,其中MPS同时检查了13例,通过MRI检查了45例,同时通过MPS同时检查了18例。将这些影像学结果与切除标本的组织病理学检查结果进行比较。结果:在肿瘤生长深度的分期中,MPS的准确性(84%)显着高于螺旋CT和MRI(分别为68%和60%) <0.05)。 MPS的特异性和敏感性分别为82%和85%;螺旋CT分别为60%和69%; MRI分别为40%和63%。在分期区域淋巴结转移方面,螺旋CT比MPS和MRI更准确(78%)(分别为71%和64%),但差异无统计学意义。螺旋CT的特异性和敏感性分别为79%和77%; MPS分别为75%和68%;结论:MPS在T分期方面优于螺旋CT或MRI,尤其是在早期食道癌中。但是,这三种模态在N分期中具有相似的准确性。螺旋CT或MRI有助于检测食道癌的远处转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号