首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Ulster Medical Journal >Accuracy of blood glucose concentrations determined by four visually read reagent strips
【2h】

Accuracy of blood glucose concentrations determined by four visually read reagent strips

机译:通过四个目视读取的试剂条确定的血糖浓度准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two new reagent strips have recently been introduced for blood glucose measurement by direct visual reading. Results obtained with these strips (Glucostix and Hypogard GA) were compared with those obtained using other commonly employed strips (BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 and Visidex II) and a standard laboratory method. Blood glucose estimations were performed on samples of venous blood drawn from 125 patients attending the diabetic clinic using each of the four strips and the laboratory method. Results obtained with the strips correlated with the laboratory values as follows: BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44, r=0.93; Glucostix r=0.93; Hypogard GA r=0.87 and Visidex II r=0.92. The lower correlation with Hypogard GA reflected consistent underestimation of the laboratory value (slope of regression line = 0.63). Readings in error by 20% or more were: BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44, 14%; Glucostix, 15%; Hypogard GA, 31%, and Visidex II, 14%. With Hypogard GA strips, 57% of readings above 16 mmol/l were inaccurate. We conclude that Hypogard GA strips cannot be recommended for direct visual reading. Acceptable results may, however, be obtained using the other three strips.Reagent strips allow reasonably accurate determinations of blood glucose concentrations when used with a reflectance meter.1, 2 Nevertheless many diabetic patients prefer to read the reagent strips visually. This method avoids the problems associated with meter calibration, is cheaper and also is more portable. Direct visual readings with BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 (Boehringer Corporation) and Visidex II (Ames) have been shown to be acceptable in the hands of medical and technical personnel.3, 4 Recently two new reagent strips have been marketed, Hypogard GA (Hypogard UK Ltd) and Glucostix (Ames), and it is claimed that they are also suitable for direct visual reading. To test the validity of these claims, we have compared results obtained using the newer strips with readings from BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 and Visidex II and with a standard laboratory method.
机译:最近已经引入了两种新的试剂条,用于通过直接视觉读取来测量血糖。用这些试纸(Glucostix和Hypogard GA)获得的结果与使用其他常用试纸(BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44和Visidex II)和标准实验室方法获得的结果进行比较。使用四个试纸和实验室方法,对从参加糖尿病诊所的125位患者中抽取的静脉血样本进行了血糖估算。用试纸条获得的结果与实验室值相关如下:BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44,r = 0.93; Glucostix r = 0.93; Hypogard GA r = 0.87,Visidex II r = 0.92。与Hypogard GA的较低相关性反映了对实验室值的一致低估(回归线的斜率= 0.63)。错误读数超过20%或更高的是:BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44,14%; Glucostix,15%; Hypogard GA(31%)和Visidex II(14%)。对于Hypogard GA试纸,超过16 mmol / l的读数中有57%不准确。我们得出的结论是,不建议将Hypogard GA条用于直接视觉阅读。但是,使用其他三个试纸条可以获得可接受的结果。试剂试纸条与反射计一起使用时可以合理准确地确定血糖浓度。 1、2 然而,许多糖尿病患者更喜欢阅读试剂视觉上剥离。这种方法避免了与仪表校准相关的问题,既便宜又便携。已经证明,在医学和技术人员手中可以使用BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44(勃林格公司)和Visidex II(Ames)进行直接视觉读取。 3,4 最近有两个新的试剂条已在市场上出售,Hypogard GA(Hypogard UK Ltd)和Glucostix(Ames),据称它们也适用于直接视觉阅读。为了测试这些说法的有效性,我们将使用较新的测试条获得的结果与BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44和Visidex II的读数以及标准实验室方法进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号