首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>RNA >Systematic comparison of microarray profiling real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing technologies for measuring differential microRNA expression
【2h】

Systematic comparison of microarray profiling real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing technologies for measuring differential microRNA expression

机译:系统比较微阵列分析实时PCR和下一代测序技术以测量差异性microRNA表达

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

RNA abundance and DNA copy number are routinely measured in high-throughput using microarray and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, and the attributes of different platforms have been extensively analyzed. Recently, the application of both microarrays and NGS has expanded to include microRNAs (miRNAs), but the relative performance of these methods has not been rigorously characterized. We analyzed three biological samples across six miRNA microarray platforms and compared their hybridization performance. We examined the utility of these platforms, as well as NGS, for the detection of differentially expressed miRNAs. We then validated the results for 89 miRNAs by real-time RT-PCR and challenged the use of this assay as a “gold standard.” Finally, we implemented a novel method to evaluate false-positive and false-negative rates for all methods in the absence of a reference method.
机译:使用微阵列和下一代测序(NGS)技术以高通量常规测量RNA丰度和DNA拷贝数,并且已经广泛分析了不同平台的属性。最近,微阵列和NGS的应用已扩展到包括microRNA(miRNA),但是这些方法的相对性能尚未得到严格的表征。我们分析了六个miRNA微阵列平台上的三个生物样品,并比较了它们的杂交性能。我们检查了这些平台以及NGS的效用,以检测差异表达的miRNA。然后,我们通过实时RT-PCR验证了89个miRNA的结果,并质疑将该测定法用作“金标准”。最后,我们实现了一种新颖的方法来在没有参考方法的情况下评估所有方法的假阳性和假阴性率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号