首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>RMD Open >Review: Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological pharmacological and surgical treatment for hand osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis
【2h】

Review: Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological pharmacological and surgical treatment for hand osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis

机译:综述:非药物药理和外科治疗手性骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统文献综述通报了2018年更新的EULAR建议治疗手部骨关节炎

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To update the evidence on efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical interventions for hand osteoarthritis (OA), a systematic literature review was performed up to June 2017, including (randomised) controlled trials or Cochrane systematic reviews. Main efficacy outcomes were pain, function and hand strength. Risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed when advisable. Of 7036 records, 127 references were included, of which 50 studies concerned non-pharmacological, 64 pharmacological and 12 surgical interventions. Many studies had high risk of bias, mainly due to inadequate randomisation or blinding. Beneficial non-pharmacological treatments included hand exercise and prolonged thumb base splinting, while single trials showed positive results for joint protection and using assistive devices. Topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) proved equally effective, while topical NSAIDs led to less adverse events. Single trials demonstrated positive results for chondroitin sulfate and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in interphalangeal joints. Pharmacological treatments for which no clear beneficial effect was shown include paracetamol, intra-articular thumb base injections of glucocorticoids or hyaluronic acid, low-dose oral glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine and anti-tumour necrosis factor. No trials compared surgery to sham or non-operative treatment. No surgical intervention for thumb base OA appeared more effective than another, although in general more complex procedures led to more complications. No interventions slowed radiographic progression. In conclusion, an overview of the evidence on efficacy and safety of treatment options for hand OA was presented and informed the task force for the updated European League Against Rheumatism management recommendations for hand OA.
机译:为了更新有关非药物,药物和手术干预对手部骨关节炎(OA)疗效和安全性的证据,截至2017年6月进行了系统的文献综述,包括(随机)对照试验或Cochrane系统综述。主要疗效指标为疼痛,功能和手部力量。评估偏见的风险。酌情进行荟萃分析。在7036笔记录中,包括127篇参考文献,其中50篇涉及非药理学研究,64项药理学和12项外科手术干预。许多研究有偏见的高风险,主要是由于随机化或盲目性不足。有益的非药物治疗包括手部锻炼和长时间的拇指夹板,而单项试验显示关节保护和使用辅助装置的积极结果。局部和口服非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)证明同样有效,而局部NSAID导致较少的不良事件。单一试验表明,在软骨指间关节中硫酸软骨素和关节内糖皮质激素注射的阳性结果。没有显示出明显的有益作用的药理治疗包括扑热息痛,糖皮质激素或透明质酸的关节拇指拇指内注射,小剂量口服糖皮质激素,羟氯喹和抗肿瘤坏死因子。没有试验将手术与假手术或非手术治疗进行比较。尽管总体上更复杂的手术导致更多的并发症,但没有针对拇指型OA的手术干预似乎比其他手术更有效。没有干预会减慢放射学进展。总之,对手OA的治疗选择的有效性和安全性的证据进行了概述,并向工作组提供了最新的欧洲风湿病联盟针对手OA的管理建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号