首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>RMD Open >Review: Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatment: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis
【2h】

Review: Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatment: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

机译:综述:非药物和非生物药物治疗的有效性和安全性:一项系统的文献综述通知2016年更新的ASAS / EULAR推荐治疗轴向性脊柱关节炎

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To assess the efficacy and safety of non-biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to inform the update of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA. A systematic literature review (2009–2016) of all non-pharmacological treatments, non-biological drugs (except targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) and surgical therapies was performed. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials were assessed for efficacy and safety, while observational studies with a comparator were assessed for safety. All relevant efficacy and safety outcomes were included. Study heterogeneity precluded data pooling. If possible, Cohen's effect size was calculated for non-pharmacological treatments. In total, 45 papers and 2 abstracts were included. Studies on non-pharmacological treatments were very heterogeneous but overall confirmed a benefit for regular exercises, with small improvements in disease activity, function and spinal mobility. New studies on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) confirmed their efficacy and new safety signals were not found. NSAIDs used continuously compared with on-demand did not reduce the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) mean change over 2 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with normal C reactive protein (CRP; ≤5 mg/L) (1 ‘negative’ RCT (0.9 vs 0.8; p=0.62)), while for patients with high CRP, conflicting results were found (1 ‘positive’ RCT (0.2 vs 1.7; p=0.003), 1 ‘negative’ RCT (1.68 vs 0.96; p=0.28)). No new trials were found for conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Short-term high-dose systemic glucocorticoids showed limited efficacy. Regular exercises may improve several outcomes. Efficacy and safety of NSAIDs in axSpA are confirmed. Glucocorticoids are not proven to be effective in axSpA and new data on csDMARDs are lacking.
机译:评估非生物疗法对轴性脊椎关节炎(axSpA)的疗效和安全性,以告知国际脊椎关节炎评估协会(ASAS)/欧洲风湿病联盟(EULAR)对axSpA管理的建议的更新。对所有非药物治疗,非生物药物(靶向合成疾病修饰抗风湿药(DMARD)除外)和外科疗法进行了系统的文献综述(2009-2016年)。评估了疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)和临床对照试验,同时评估了使用比较器进行的观察性研究的安全性。包括所有相关的疗效和安全性结果。研究异构性排除了数据池。如果可能,计算非药物治疗的Cohen效应大小。总共包括45篇论文和2篇摘要。非药物治疗的研究异质性很强,但总的来说证实了定期锻炼的益处,疾病活动,功能和脊柱活动性的改善很小。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)的新研究证实了它们的功效,未发现新的安全性信号。连续使用与按需使用的NSAID并没有降低C反应蛋白正常(CRP;≤5μmg/ L)的强直性脊柱炎患者2年来经改良的斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分(mSASSS)的平均变化(1'负' RCT(0.9 vs 0.8; p = 0.62)),而对于CRP高的患者,发现了相互矛盾的结果(1个``阳性''RCT(0.2 vs 1.7; p = 0.003),1个``阴性''RCT(1.68 vs 0.96; p = 0.28))。没有发现常规合成DMARD(csDMARD)的新试验。短期大剂量全身性糖皮质激素显示疗效有限。定期锻炼可能会改善一些结果。确认了NSAID在axSpA中的功效和安全性。糖皮质激素尚未被证明对axSpA有效,并且缺少有关csDMARD的新数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号