首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Scope for improved eco-efficiency varies among diverse cropping systems
【2h】

Scope for improved eco-efficiency varies among diverse cropping systems

机译:不同种植系统之间提高生态效率的范围各不相同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Global food security requires eco-efficient agriculture to produce the required food and fiber products concomitant with ecologically efficient use of resources. This eco-efficiency concept is used to diagnose the state of agricultural production in China (irrigated wheat–maize double-cropping systems), Zimbabwe (rainfed maize systems), and Australia (rainfed wheat systems). More than 3,000 surveyed crop yields in these three countries were compared against simulated grain yields at farmer-specified levels of nitrogen (N) input. Many Australian commercial wheat farmers are both close to existing production frontiers and gain little prospective return from increasing their N input. Significant losses of N from their systems, either as nitrous oxide emissions or as nitrate leached from the soil profile, are infrequent and at low intensities relative to their level of grain production. These Australian farmers operate close to eco-efficient frontiers in regard to N, and so innovations in technologies and practices are essential to increasing their production without added economic or environmental risks. In contrast, many Chinese farmers can reduce N input without sacrificing production through more efficient use of their fertilizer input. In fact, there are real prospects for the double-cropping systems on the North China Plain to achieve both production increases and reduced environmental risks. Zimbabwean farmers have the opportunity for significant production increases by both improving their technical efficiency and increasing their level of input; however, doing so will require improved management expertise and greater access to institutional support for addressing the higher risks. This paper shows that pathways for achieving improved eco-efficiency will differ among diverse cropping systems.
机译:全球粮食安全需要生态高效的农业来生产所需的粮食和纤维产品,同时还要对资源进行生态有效利用。这种生态效率概念可用于诊断中国(灌溉的小麦-玉米双作系统),津巴布韦(暴雨的玉米系统)和澳大利亚(暴雨的小麦系统)的农业生产状况。将这三个国家中超过3,000个调查的农作物产量与农民指定的氮(N)输入水平下的模拟谷物产量进行了比较。许多澳大利亚的商业化小麦农民都接近现有的生产前沿,并且因增加氮素投入而获得的预期回报很少。由于氮氧化物的排放或土壤剖面中硝态氮的淋失,氮素从系统中大量流失的频率相对较低,且相对于谷物的生产水平而言,强度较低。这些澳大利亚农民在氮肥方面接近生态高效的边境,因此技术和实践的创新对于在不增加经济或环境风险的前提下增加产量至关重要。相比之下,许多中国农民可以通过更有效地利用其肥料输入来减少氮的输入而不会牺牲产量。实际上,华北平原上的双作系统有实现增产和减少环境风险的真正前景。津巴布韦的农民有机会通过提高技术效率和增加投入水平来大幅增加产量;但是,这样做将需要改善管理专业知识,并有更多的机构支持来应对更高的风险。本文表明,在不同的种植系统之间,提高生态效率的途径将有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号