首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Culture morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species
【2h】

Culture morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species

机译:文化道德和个体差异:物种之间的可比性和不可比性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Major routes to identifying individual differences (in diverse species) include studies of behaviour patterns as represented in language and neurophysiology. But results from these approaches appear not to converge on some major dimensions. Identifying dimensions of human variation least applicable to non-human species may help to partition human-specific individual differences of recent evolutionary origin from those shared across species. Human culture includes learned, enforced social-norm systems that are symbolically reinforced and referenced in displays signalling adherence. At a key juncture in human evolution bullying aggression and deception-based cheating apparently became censured in the language of a moral community, enabling mutual observation coordinated in gossip, associated with external sanctions. That still-conserved cultural paradigm moralistically regulates selfish advantage-taking, with shared semantics and explicit rules. Ethics and moral codes remain critical and universal components of human culture and have a stronger imprint in language than most aspects of the currently popular Big-Five taxonomy, a model that sets out five major lines of individual-differences variation in human personality. In other species (e.g. chimpanzees), human observers might see apparent individual differences in morality-relevant traits, but not because the animals have human-analogue sanctioning systems. Removing the moral dimension of personality and other human-specific manifestations (e.g. religion) may aid in identifying those other bases of individual differences more ubiquitous across species.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences’.
机译:识别个体差异(在不同物种中)的主要途径包括研究语言和神经生理学所代表的行为模式。但是,这些方法的结果似乎在某些主要方面并不收敛。确定最不适合非人类物种的人类变异的维度,可能有助于将最近进化起源的人类特定个体差异与跨物种共有的个体差异区分开。人类文化包括学到的,强制执行的社会规范体系,这些体系在象征性遵守的展示中得到了象征性的强化和引用。在人类进化的关键关头,欺凌侵略和基于欺骗的作弊显然已被道德社区的语言所谴责,这使得相互之间的观察可以在八卦中进行,并伴有外部制裁。仍然保守的文化范式在道德上以共享的语义和明确的规则来规范自私的利益获取。伦理和道德规范仍然是人类文化的关键和普遍组成部分,并且在语言上的烙印比当前流行的“大五类”分类法的大多数方面都要强。“五大分类法”列出了人格差异的五大主线。在其他物种(例如黑猩猩)中,人类观察者可能会看到与道德相关的性状存在明显的个体差异,但这不是因为动物具有类似人类的制裁系统。消除人格和其他特定于人类的表现的道德层面的维度(例如宗教)可能有助于识别其他物种之间更普遍存在的个体差异基础。本文是主题“多样性的多元观点:多学科研究方法”的一部分。个体差异分类法”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号