首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Global evolutionary isolation measures can capture key local conservation species in Nearctic and Neotropical bird communities
【2h】

Global evolutionary isolation measures can capture key local conservation species in Nearctic and Neotropical bird communities

机译:全球进化隔离措施可以捕获近鸟类和新热带鸟类群落中的关键本地保护物种

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Understanding how to prioritize among the most deserving imperilled species has been a focus of biodiversity science for the past three decades. Though global metrics that integrate evolutionary history and likelihood of loss have been successfully implemented, conservation is typically carried out at sub-global scales on communities of species rather than among members of complete taxonomic assemblages. Whether and how global measures map to a local scale has received little scrutiny. At a local scale, conservation-relevant assemblages of species are likely to be made up of relatively few species spread across a large phylogenetic tree, and as a consequence there are potentially relatively large amounts of evolutionary history at stake. We ask to what extent global metrics of evolutionary history are useful for conservation priority setting at the community level by evaluating the extent to which three global measures of evolutionary isolation (evolutionary distinctiveness (ED), average pairwise distance (APD) and the pendant edge or unique phylogenetic diversity (PD) contribution) capture community-level phylogenetic and trait diversity for a large sample of Neotropical and Nearctic bird communities. We find that prioritizing the most ED species globally safeguards more than twice the total PD of local communities on average, but that this does not translate into increased local trait diversity. By contrast, global APD is strongly related to the APD of those same species at the community level, and prioritizing these species also safeguards local PD and trait diversity. The next step for biologists is to understand the variation in the concordance of global and local level scores and what this means for conservation priorities: we need more directed research on the use of different measures of evolutionary isolation to determine which might best capture desirable aspects of biodiversity.
机译:在过去的三十年中,了解如何在最受苦的濒危物种中确定优先次序一直是生物多样性科学的重点。尽管已经成功地实现了将进化史和损失可能性整合在一起的全球指标,但是保护工作通常是在亚全球范围内对物种群落而不是在完整的分类学组合中进行的。全球措施是否以及如何将其映射到地方规模几乎没有受到审查。在本地范围内,与保护相关的物种集合很可能是由分布在大型系统树上的相对较少的物种组成的,因此,潜在的进化历史也相对较多。我们通过评估进化隔离的三个全局度量(进化独特性(ED),平均成对距离(APD)和悬垂边缘或独特的系统发育多样性(PD)贡献)捕获了大量新热带和近鸟类鸟类群落的群落水平系统发育和性状多样性。我们发现,在全球范围内优先处理大多数ED物种,可以平均保护的平均PD是当地社区总PD的两倍以上,但这并不能转化为增加本地性状多样性。相比之下,全球APD与同一物种在社区一级的APD密切相关,对这些物种进行优先排序还可以维护局部PD和性状多样性。对于生物学家来说,下一步就是要了解全球和地方级别评分的一致性变化以及这对于保护重点的意义:我们需要对定向进化的研究进行更直接的研究,以使用不同的进化隔离手段来确定哪种方法可以最好地捕捉到理想的方面。生物多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号