首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Getting a better picture of microbial evolution en route to a network of genomes
【2h】

Getting a better picture of microbial evolution en route to a network of genomes

机译:更好地了解微生物进化到基因组网络的途中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most current thinking about evolution is couched in the concept of trees. The notion of a tree with recursively bifurcating branches representing recurrent divergence events is a plausible metaphor to describe the evolution of multicellular organisms like vertebrates or land plants. But if we try to force the tree metaphor onto the whole of the evolutionary process, things go badly awry, because the more closely we inspect microbial genomes through the looking glass of gene and genome sequence comparisons, the smaller the amount of the data that fits the concept of a bifurcating tree becomes. That is mainly because among microbes, endosymbiosis and lateral gene transfer are important, two mechanisms of natural variation that differ from the kind of natural variation that Darwin had in mind. For such reasons, when it comes to discussing the relationships among all living things, that is, including the microbes and all of their genes rather than just one or a select few, many biologists are now beginning to talk about networks rather than trees in the context of evolutionary relationships among microbial chromosomes. But talk is not enough. If we were to actually construct networks instead of trees to describe the evolutionary process, what would they look like? Here we consider endosymbiosis and an example of a network of genomes involving 181 sequenced prokaryotes and how that squares off with some ideas about early cell evolution.
机译:当前关于进化的大多数想法都植根于树木的概念中。具有递归分叉的树的概念代表递归分歧事件,这是一个合理的比喻,用于描述诸如脊椎动物或陆地植物的多细胞生物的进化。但是,如果我们试图将树的隐喻强加于整个进化过程中,那么事情就糟透了,因为我们越是通过基因和基因组序列比较的视镜来仔细检查微生物基因组,则适合的数据量就越少。分叉树的概念就变成了。这主要是因为在微生物中,共生和横向基因转移很重要,这两种自然变异机制与达尔文所想到的自然变异不同。因此,在讨论所有生物之间的关系时,即包括微生物及其所有基因,而不仅仅是一种或少数几种,现在许多生物学家开始谈论网络而不是树木中的树木。微生物染色体之间进化关系的背景。但是谈话是不够的。如果我们实际上是用网络而不是树来描述进化过程,那么它们会是什么样?在这里,我们考虑内共生和一个涉及181个测序原核生物的基因组网络的例子,以及如何与早期细胞进化的一些观点相吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号