首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM >Varsity Medical Ethics Debate 2015: should nootropic drugs be available under prescription on the NHS?
【2h】

Varsity Medical Ethics Debate 2015: should nootropic drugs be available under prescription on the NHS?

机译:2015年大学运动医学伦理学辩论:NHS是否应根据处方提供促智药物?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The 2015 Varsity Medical Ethics debate convened upon the motion: “This house believes nootropic drugs should be available under prescription”. This annual debate between students from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, now in its seventh year, provided the starting point for arguments on the subject. The present article brings together and extends many of the arguments put forward during the debate. We explore the current usage of nootropic drugs, their safety and whether it would be beneficial to individuals and society as a whole for them to be available under prescription. The Varsity Medical Debate was first held in 2008 with the aim of allowing students to engage in discussion about ethics and policy within healthcare. The event is held annually and it is hoped that this will allow future leaders to voice a perspective on the arguments behind topics that will feature heavily in future healthcare and science policy. This year the Oxford University Medical Society at the Oxford Union hosted the debate.
机译:2015年Varsity医学伦理学辩论针对该动议召开:“该院认为促智药物应根据处方获得”。牛津大学和剑桥大学的学生之间的这一年度辩论已进入第七年,为有关该主题的辩论提供了起点。本文汇集并扩展了辩论期间提出的许多论点。我们探讨了促智药物的当前用法,其安全性以及按处方可获得的药物是否对个人和整个社会都有利。大学运动辩论赛于2008年首次举行,目的是让学生参与有关医疗保健领域的道德和政策的讨论。该活动每年举行一次,希望这将使未来的领导人对未来医疗保健和科学政策中具有重要意义的主题背后的论点发表看法。今年,牛津大学联合会的牛津大学医学会主持了辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号