首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus concurrent cisplatin and docetaxel with radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
【2h】

Concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus concurrent cisplatin and docetaxel with radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

机译:顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶与同期顺铂和多西他赛联合放疗治疗食管鳞状细胞癌:倾向评分匹配分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer is unknown. Here, we compared the survival outcomes and toxicity of definitive chemoradiotherapy with either cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (PF) or docetaxel/cisplatin (DP) in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this study, we identified 317 patients with ESCC who received PF or DP concurrently with definitive radiotherapy. PF group patients received two cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2) at 4-week intervals during radiotherapy. DP group patients received a concurrent three-weekly schedule of docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2) or cisplatin (25 mg/m2) and docetaxel (25 mg/m2) weekly. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using propensity score (−adjusted, −weighted, −stratified, and −matched) analyses. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of unmeasured confounders. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for propensity score demonstrated an improvement in OS and PFS with DP group in comparison with PF group (hazard ratio, 0.700; 95% CI, 0.577-0.851) and similar results were achieved with propensity score matching and stratification. Grade 3-4 esophagitis was more common (16/102 vs. 4/102) and grade 3-4 thrombopenia and skin toxicity were less common (3/102 vs. 10/102; 7/102 vs. 19/102; respectively) in the PF group than the DP group. In conclusion, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the DP regimen resulted in better OS and PFS compared to concurrent PF regimen with tolerable toxicities in ESCC patients. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm the efficacy of the DP regimen.
机译:食管癌的最佳同时放疗方案与放疗是未知的。在这里,我们比较了不可切除的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者使用顺铂/ 5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)或多西他赛/顺铂(DP)进行明确放化疗的生存结果和毒性。在这项研究中,我们确定了317例ESCC患者,他们同时接受了PF或DP以及确定性放疗。 PF组患者在放疗期间每隔4周接受两个周期的顺铂(60 mg / m 2 )和5-氟尿嘧啶(300 mg / m 2 )。 DP组患者同时接受多西他赛(60 mg / m 2 )和顺铂(80 mg / m 2 )或顺铂(25 mg / m < sup> 2 )和多西他赛(25 mg / m 2 )每周一次。使用倾向评分(-调整,-加权,-分层和-匹配)分析比较总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。进行了敏感性分析以检查未测混杂因素的影响。倾向评分的治疗加权权重的倒数表明,与PF组相比,DP组的OS和PFS有所改善(危险比,0.700; 95%CI,0.577-0.851),并且倾向评分匹配和分层获得了相似的结果。 3-4级食管炎更为常见(16/102对4/102),而3-4级食管减少症和皮肤毒性较不常见(3/102对10/102; 7/102对19/102;分别是)在PF组中比在DP组中。总而言之,与同时PF方案相比,DP方案同时放化疗可以使ESCC患者的OS和PFS更好。需要进行前瞻性随机试验以确认DP方案的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号