首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda
【2h】

Validity and Reliability of General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults in Uganda

机译:乌干达成年人一般营养知识问卷的有效性和可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study sought to develop and validate a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire (GNKQ) for Ugandan adults. The initial draft consisted of 133 items on five constructs associated with nutrition knowledge; expert recommendations (16 items), food groups (70 items), selecting food (10 items), nutrition and disease relationship (23 items), and food fortification in Uganda (14 items). The questionnaire validity was evaluated in three studies. For the content validity (study 1), a panel of five content matter nutrition experts reviewed the GNKQ draft before and after face validity. For the face validity (study 2), head teachers and health workers (n = 27) completed the questionnaire before attending one of three focus groups to review the clarity of the items. For the construct and test-rest reliability (study 3), head teachers (n = 40) from private and public primary schools and nutrition (n = 52) and engineering (n = 49) students from Makerere University took the questionnaire twice (two weeks apart). Experts agreed (content validity index, CVI > 0.9; reliability, Gwet’s AC1 > 0.85) that all constructs were relevant to evaluate nutrition knowledge. After the focus groups, 29 items were identified as unclear, requiring major (n = 5) and minor (n = 24) reviews. The final questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α > 0.95), test-retest reliability (r = 0.89), and differentiated (p < 0.001) nutrition knowledge scores between nutrition (67 ± 5) and engineering (39 ± 11) students. Only the construct on nutrition recommendations was unreliable (Cronbach α = 0.51, test-retest r = 0.55), which requires further optimization. The final questionnaire included topics on food groups (41 items), selecting food (2 items), nutrition and disease relationship (14 items), and food fortification in Uganda (22 items) and had good content, construct, and test-retest reliability to evaluate nutrition knowledge among Ugandan adults.
机译:这项研究旨在开发和验证针对乌干达成年人的一般营养知识问卷(GNKQ)。初稿包括与营养知识有关的五个结构的133个项目;专家建议(16项),食物组(70项),选择食物(10项),营养与疾病的关系(23项)以及乌干达的食物强化(14项)。在三项研究中评估了问卷的有效性。对于内容的有效性(研究1),由五名内容物营养专家组成的小组在面部有效性之前和之后审查了GNKQ草案。为了提高面部有效性(研究2),班主任和卫生工作者(n = 27)完成了问卷,然后参加了三个焦点小组之一以审查项目的清晰度。对于结构和测试休息的可靠性(研究3),来自麦克雷雷大学的私立和公立小学的班主任(n = 40)和营养(n = 52)和工科(n = 49)学生两次接受了问卷(两次相隔数周)。专家们同意(内容有效性指数,CVI> 0.9;可靠性,Gwet的AC1> 0.85),所有构建物都与评估营养知识有关。在焦点小组会议之后,有29项被确定为不清楚,需要进行主要(n = 5)和次要(n = 24)审查。最终的问卷具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbachα> 0.95),重测信度(r = 0.89),并且在营养(67±5)和工科(39±11)学生之间有差异(p <0.001)营养知识得分。仅营养推荐的结构不可靠(Cronbachα= 0.51,重测r = 0.55),这需要进一步优化。最终的问卷包括有关食物类别(41个项目),选择食物(2个项目),营养与疾病的关系(14个项目)以及乌干达的食物强化(22个项目)的主题,并且具有良好的内容,结构和重测信度。评估乌干达成年人的营养知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号