首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons >Three-Port Versus Standard Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital in Eastern Nepal
【2h】

Three-Port Versus Standard Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital in Eastern Nepal

机译:三端口与标准四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:在尼泊尔东部一家社区教学医院的随机对照临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives:With increasing surgeon experience, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has undergone many refinements including reduction in port number and size. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be safe and feasible in various clinical trials. However, whether it offers any additional advantages remains controversial. This study reports a randomized trial that compared the clinical outcomes of 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
机译:目的:随着外科医生经验的增加,腹腔镜胆囊切除术经历了许多改进,包括减少了端口数量和尺寸。据报道,在各种临床试验中,三端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的。但是,它是否具有任何其他优势仍存在争议。这项研究报告了一项随机试验,该试验比较了3端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规4端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号