A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is the fourth port really required

Ben Wang; Cheng Peng; Chuanzong Zhao; Enyu Liu; Hua Yan; Jianguo Hong; Jun Niu; Na Wang; Xuting Zhi; Zequn Li; Zhengchuan Niu; Zongquan Xu

首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is the fourth port really required

【24h】

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is the fourth port really required

机译：三端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性，随机对照试验：真正需要的是第四端口

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine》 |2016年第2期|共页
作者
Ben Wang; Cheng Peng; Chuanzong Zhao; Enyu Liu; Hua Yan; Jianguo Hong; Jun Niu; Na Wang; Xuting Zhi; Zequn Li; Zhengchuan Niu; Zongquan Xu;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类医药、卫生;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 08:55:22

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J] . Melissa S. Phillips, Jeffrey M. Marks, Kurt Roberts, Surgical Endoscopy . 2012,第5期

机译：传统四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果
2. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. [J] . Melissa S Phillips, Jeffrey M Marks, Kurt Roberts, Surgical Endoscopy . 2012,第5期

机译：传统的四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果。
3. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. [J] . Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, The American Journal of Surgery . 2011,第3期

机译：单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
4. A Preliminary Study of Surgeon Stress Measures During Randomized Controlled Trials of 4-port vs. Single Incision Cholecystectomies [C] . B.R. Lowndes, J. Bingener-Casey, M.S. Hallbeck Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting . 2014

机译：4口胆囊切除术与单切口胆囊切除术随机对照试验中外科医生压力测量的初步研究
5. Use, Cost, and Comparative Effectiveness of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy at U.S. Hospitals [D] . Chaudhry, Mubashir Tufail. 2018

机译：美国医院使用机器人对腹腔镜和开放性胆囊切除术的使用，成本和比较效果
6. Three-Port Versus Standard Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital in Eastern Nepal [O] . Manoj Kumar, Chandra Shekhar Agrawal, Rakesh Kumar Gupta 2007

机译：三端口与标准四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术：在尼泊尔东部一家社区教学医院的随机对照临床试验
7. Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a clinical trial [O] . TAMER AKAY 2020

机译：三端口与标准四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术：临床试验

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is the fourth port really required

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅