首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientifica >Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Study
【2h】

Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Study

机译:无结张力带和传统不锈钢钢丝张力带固定治疗内踝骨折的回顾性临床研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The traditional stainless steel wire tension band (WTB) has been popularized for small avulsion fractures at the medial malleolus. Despite the tension band principle creating a stable construct, complications continue to arise utilizing the traditional stainless steel WTB with patients experiencing hardware irritation at the tension band site and subsequent hardware removal. Coupled with hardware irritation is fatigue failure with the wire. The goal of this investigation was to retrospectively compare this traditional wire technique to an innovative knotless tension band (KTB) technique in order to decrease costly complications. A total of 107 patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcome measures include descriptive data, fracture classification, results through economic costs, and fixation results (including hardware status, healing status, pain status, and time to healing). The KTB group had a 13% lower true cost as compared to the WTB group while the fixation results were equivocal for the measured outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the innovative KTB is comparable to the traditional WTB while offering a lower true cost, an irritation free reduction all without the frustration of returning to the operating room for additional hardware removal, which averages approximately to $8,288.
机译:传统的不锈钢钢丝拉紧带(WTB)已被广泛用于内踝的小撕脱性骨折。尽管张力带原理产生了稳定的结构,但是利用传统的不锈钢WTB继续出现并发症,患者在张力带部位受到硬件刺激并随后移除硬件。加上硬件刺激会导致电线疲劳失效。这项研究的目的是将这种传统的线材技术与一种创新的无结张力带(KTB)技术进行回顾性比较,以减少昂贵的并发症。总共对107例患者进行了回顾,至少随访1年。结果指标包括描述性数据,骨折分类,通过经济成本得出的结果以及固定结果(包括硬件状态,愈合状态,疼痛状态和愈合时间)。与WTB组相比,KTB组的真实成本降低了13%,而固定结果对于所测得的结果却模棱两可。我们的结果表明,创新的KTB可以与传统的WTB相提并论,同时提供更低的真实成本,无刺激的减少,而无需返回手术室进行额外的硬件拆除(平均约8,288美元)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号