首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Porcine Health Management >A comment on the paper ‘A comparison between lesions found during meat inspection of finishing pigs raised under organic/free-range conditions and conventional indoor conditions’ by Alban et al. 2015
【2h】

A comment on the paper ‘A comparison between lesions found during meat inspection of finishing pigs raised under organic/free-range conditions and conventional indoor conditions’ by Alban et al. 2015

机译:Alban等人对论文在有机/自由放养条件下饲养的肥育猪进行肉类检查时发现的病变与常规室内条件之间的比较的评论。 2015年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a critical comment on a paper published in Porcine Health Management in 2015, presenting a comparison between lesions from meat inspection at one abattoir on slaughter pigs classified in to two different production forms: organic/free-range conditions and conventional indoor conditions. The conclusion made by the paper that 13 lesion types has a higher prevalence in organic/free-range pigs and 4 lesion types occurred less frequently in organic/free-range finishers compared to conventional finishers is correct except that 5 (instead of 4) lesion types occurred less frequently in organic/free-range finishers. However, these five types of lesions represent 74 % of all lesions recorded among conventional indoor, conventional free-range and organic pigs in one slaughter house from October 1 2012 to September 26 2013.
机译:这是对2015年《猪肉健康管理》上发表的一篇论文的重要评论,该论文对在屠宰场的一头屠宰场的肉类检查所造成的损害进行了比较,将其分为两种不同的生产形式:有机/自由放养条件和常规室内条件。该论文得出的结论是,与常规育肥猪相比,有机/自由放牧猪中13种类型的病患患病率更高,有机/自由育肥猪中发生的4种病害发生率较低,这是正确的,只是5种(而不是4种)病害在自然/自由放牧整理机中,此类类型出现的频率较低。但是,从2012年10月1日至2013年9月26日,在一间屠宰场的常规室内,常规放养和有机猪中,这五种类型的病变占所有病变的74%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号