首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Europes Journal of Psychology >Dysrationalia Among University Students: The Role of Cognitive Abilities Different Aspects of Rational Thought and Self-Control in Explaining Epistemically Suspect Beliefs
【2h】

Dysrationalia Among University Students: The Role of Cognitive Abilities Different Aspects of Rational Thought and Self-Control in Explaining Epistemically Suspect Beliefs

机译:大学生中的 Dysrationalia:认知能力解释性理性思维和自我控制在解释认识上的怀疑信念中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the study was to investigate the role that cognitive abilities, rational thinking abilities, cognitive styles and self-control play in explaining the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs among university students. A total of 159 students participated in the study. We found that different aspects of rational thought (i.e. rational thinking abilities and cognitive styles) and self-control, but not intelligence, significantly predicted the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs. Based on these findings, it may be suggested that intelligence and rational thinking, although related, represent two fundamentally different constructs. Thus, deviations from rational thinking could be well described by the term “dysrationalia”, meaning the inability to think rationally despite having adequate intelligence. We discuss the implications of the results, as well as some drawbacks of the study.
机译:该研究的目的是调查认知能力,理性思维能力,认知方式和自我控制在解释大学生对认识上可疑的信念的认可中的作用。共有159名学生参加了这项研究。我们发现理性思维的不同方面(即理性思维能力和认知方式)和自我控制能力(而非智力)显着预测了认识论上可疑信念的认可。基于这些发现,可以建议,尽管智力和理性思维相关,但代表了两种根本不同的结构。因此,可以用“ dysrationalia”一词很好地描述与理性思维的背离,这意味着尽管有足够的智力仍无法理性地思考。我们讨论了结果的含义以及该研究的一些缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号