首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EXCLI Journal >Efficacy of antioxidant in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Efficacy of antioxidant in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:抗氧化剂在特发性肺纤维化中的功效:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic oxido-inflammatory disorder of the lung. Oxidative stress is widely recognized as a central feature of IPF. Antioxidant therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment for IPF. An array of clinical trials describing the therapeutic impact of these drugs have been reporting albeit with conflicting evidence points. We performed a meta-analysis of trials in which efficacy of antioxidant therapy was compared with control in IPF. Systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CPCI-S (Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science), ICTRP (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), and Google Scholar till June 2016 by two independent researchers. Various outcomes such as changes in pulmonary function tests (change in vital capacity [ΔVC], change in forced vital capacity [ΔFVC], change in percentage of predicted vital capacity [Δ%VC], and change in percentage of predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity [Δ%DLco]), changes in 6 minutes walking test distance (Δ6MWT), rates of adverse events, and rates of death, were included. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan V.5.3. Twelve studies (n = 1062) were identified that used antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine and lecithinized superoxide dismutase) as a treatment for IPF. Overall, there was no association of antioxidant therapy with ΔFVC (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI:-0.07 to 0.61; P = 0.12), ΔFVC (%) (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI:-0.56 to 0.36; P = 0.66) and 6MWT (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI:-0.11 to 0.20; P = 0.59) in IPF patients. However, combined antioxidant therapy was found to be associated with %VC (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.64; P = 0.008) and Δ%DLco (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.29; P = 0.05) in IPF patients. Strong evidence was obtained that the antioxidants increased adverse effects adverse events (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.75 to 3.24; P = 0.23) but it did not associate mortality (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44 to 2.11; P = 0.92). The use of significant clinical heterogeneity, low statistical power, high dropout rates, duration of follow-ups, and dosing regimens of antioxidant agents. Combined antioxidant therapy seems to be a safe and effective therapy for IPF patients which provides a more beneficial effect in terms of VC, and DLco rather than monotherapy. Further randomized controlled trials with homogeneous outcome measures are needed.
机译:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种慢性肺部氧化性炎症。氧化应激被广泛认为是IPF的主要特征。已经提出抗氧化疗法作为IPF的有效疗法。一系列描述这些药物治疗效果的临床试验尽管证据点相互矛盾,但仍在报告中。我们对试验进行了荟萃分析,其中将抗氧化剂治疗的功效与IPF中的对照进行了比较。截至2016年6月,由两名独立研究人员在PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,CPCI-S(会议论文引文索引科学),ICTRP(国际临床试验注册平台)和Google Scholar中进行了系统的文献检索。各种结果,例如肺功能检查的变化(肺活量[ΔVC]的变化,强制肺活量[ΔFVC]的变化,预测肺活量的百分比[Δ%VC]的变化和预测一氧化碳扩散量的百分比的变化[Δ%DLco]),6分钟步行测试距离的变化(Δ6MWT),不良事件发生率和死亡率。所有统计分析均使用RevMan V.5.3进行。十二项研究(n = 1062)被确定为使用抗氧化剂(N-乙酰半胱氨酸和卵磷脂超氧化物歧化酶)来治疗IPF。总体而言,抗氧化剂治疗与ΔFVC(SMD = 0.27,95%CI:-0.07至0.61; P = 0.12),ΔFVC(%)(SMD = -0.10,95%CI:-0.56至0.36; P = 0.66)和6MWT(SMD = -0.04,95%CI:-0.11至0.20; P = 0.59)。但是,发现抗氧化剂联合治疗与%VC(SMD = 0.37,95%CI:0.09至0.64; P = 0.008)和Δ%DLco(SMD = 0.15,95%CI:0.00至0.29; P = 0.05)有关)在IPF患者中。有力证据表明,抗氧化剂可增加不良反应的不良反应(OR = 1.56,95%CI:0.75至3.24; P = 0.23),但与死亡率无关(OR = 0.96,95%CI:0.44至2.11; P = 0.92)。使用显着的临床异质性,较低的统计功效,较高的辍学率,随访时间以及抗氧化剂的给药方案。对于IPF患者,抗氧化剂联合疗法似乎是一种安全有效的疗法,与VC和DLco相比,单药疗法更有益。需要进一步的具有均一结果指标的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号