首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Facts Views Vision in ObGyn >Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop score to predict successful labour induction in term pregnancies
【2h】

Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop score to predict successful labour induction in term pregnancies

机译:通过阴道超声检查与Bishop评分相比较的宫颈长度可预测足月妊娠成功引产

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: To compare the value of transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of the cervical length versus the Bishop score, prior to induction of labour, in predicting the mode of delivery within four days.Materials and Methods: This longitudinal study included 110 women (at term, singleton, vertex presentation) in whom induction of labour was performed at 37-42 weeks of gestation. Cervical length on transvaginal ultrasound and the Bishop score were assessed prior to induction according to standard protocol. Medical records were reviewed for relevant demographic and clinical data.Primary outcome criterion was successful vaginal delivery within 96 h. Univariate analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine differences between variables possibly predicting outcome.Results: Of the 110 women 66 were nulliparous and 44 multiparous. Vaginal delivery within 96 h was successful in 48 (73%) nulliparous and in 40 (91%) multiparous women ( i.e. in 80% of the total population). The overall rate of caesarean delivery was 17%.There was a significant difference between nulliparous and multiparous women in age, cervical length (mean in mm in nulliparous women: 29.31, range: 5.00-56.00; in multiparous women: 37.04, range: 12.00-56.00), Bishop score and successful induction, but no significant difference between these subgroups in neonatal outcomes.Only the Bishop score in nulliparous women showed a significant relationship between this variable and predicting successful labour induction (area under the ROC curve 0.679; standard error 0.73; p < 0.05; 95% CI: 0.536-0.823).The best cut-off value for the Bishop score was 3, with a sensitivity of 56.3% and a specificity of 72.2%.Conclusion: In this study group significant independent prediction of vaginal delivery within 96 h is provided by the Bishop score but only in nulliparous women. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length is not a significant independent predictor of vaginal delivery within 96 h.
机译:目的:比较引产前经阴道超声检查宫颈长度和Bishop评分在预测四天内分娩方式中的价值。材料与方法:这项纵向研究包括110名妇女(足月,单胎) ,即顶点显示),在妊娠37-42周时进行引产。根据标准方案,在诱导前评估经阴道超声检查的宫颈长度和Bishop评分。查阅病历以了解相关人口统计学和临床​​数据。主要结局指标是在96小时内成功分娩。单变量分析和受试者工作特征曲线用来检查可能预测结果的变量之间的差异。结果:110例女性中,有62例为未产妇,多胎的为44例。 96小时内阴道分娩成功(48%(73%)未生育)和40(91%)多胎妇女(即总人口的80%)。剖腹产的总体比例为17%。未产妇和多胎妇女的年龄,宫颈长度之间存在显着差异(未产妇的平均mm数:29.31,范围:5.00-56.00;多胎妇女的均数:37.04,范围:12.00 -56.00),Bishop评分和成功引产,但这些亚组之间在新生儿结局方面无显着差异,只有未产妇中的Bishop评分显示该变量与预测成功引产之间存在显着关系(ROC曲线下面积0.679;标准误) 0.73; p <0.05; 95%CI:0.536-0.823).Bishop评分的最佳临界值为3,敏感性为56.3%,特异性为72.2%。 Bishop评分可确定96小时内的阴道分娩率,但仅在未产妇中。经阴道超声检查颈椎长度不是96小时内阴道分娩的重要独立预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号