首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Effect Anticipation Affects Perceptual Cognitive and Motor Phases of Response Preparation: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study
【2h】

Effect Anticipation Affects Perceptual Cognitive and Motor Phases of Response Preparation: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study

机译:效果预期影响响应准备的知觉认知和运动阶段:来自事件相关电位(ERP)研究的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The anticipation of action effects is a basic process that can be observed even for key-pressing responses in a stimulus-response paradigm. In Ziessler et al.’s () experiments participants first learned arbitrary effects of key-pressing responses. In the test phase an imperative stimulus determined the response, but participants withheld the response until a Go-stimulus appeared. Reaction times (RTs) were shorter if the Go-stimulus was compatible with the learned response effect. This is strong evidence that effect representations were activated during response planning. Here, we repeated the experiment using event-related potentials (ERPs), and we found that Go-stimulus locked ERPs depended on the compatibility relationship between the Go-stimulus and the response effect. In general, this supports the interpretation of the behavioral data. More specifically, differences in the ERPs between compatible and incompatible Go-stimuli were found for the early perceptual P1 component and the later frontal P2 component. P1 differences were found only in the second half of the experiment and for long stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between imperative stimulus and Go-stimulus, i.e., when the effect was fully anticipated and the perceptual system was prepared for the effect-compatible Go-stimulus. P2 amplitudes, likely associated with evaluation and conflict detection, were larger when Go-stimulus and effect were incompatible; presumably, incompatibility increased the difficulty of effect anticipation. Onset of response-locked lateralized readiness potentials (R-LRPs) occurred earlier under incompatible conditions indicating extended motor processing. Together, these results strongly suggest that effect anticipation affects all (i.e., perceptual, cognitive, and motor) phases of response preparation.
机译:预期动作效果是一个基本过程,即使在刺激-响应范例中也可以观察到按键响应。在Ziessler等人的()实验中,参与者首先了解了按键响应的任意效果。在测试阶段,命令式刺激确定了响应,但参与者保留了响应,直到出现Go-刺激。如果Go刺激与学习的反应效果兼容,则反应时间(RTs)会更短。有力的证据表明,在响应计划期间激活了效果表示。在这里,我们使用事件相关电位(ERP)重复了该实验,我们发现Go刺激锁定的ERPs依赖于Go刺激与响应效果之间的兼容性关系。通常,这支持对行为数据的解释。更具体地说,在早期知觉P1成分和后期额叶P2成分中发现了兼容和不兼容的Go-刺激之间的ERPs差异。 P1差异仅在实验的后半部分和命令性刺激与Go刺激之间的长时间刺激发作异步(SOA)时才发现,即当完全预期了效果并且为与效果兼容的Go-刺激。当Go刺激和效果不兼容时,可能与评估和冲突检测相关的P2幅度较大;据推测,不相容性增加了预期效果的难度。在不兼容的条件下,响应锁定的横向准备就绪电位(R-LRP)的发作较早发生,表明电机处理得到延长。总之,这些结果强烈表明,效果预期会影响响应准备的所有(即,感知,认知和运动)阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号