首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Nutrition >Baseline Participant Characteristics and Risk for Dropout from 10 Obesity Randomized Controlled Trials: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Level Data
【2h】

Baseline Participant Characteristics and Risk for Dropout from 10 Obesity Randomized Controlled Trials: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Level Data

机译:10名肥胖症随机对照试验的基线参与者特征和辍学风险:个体水平数据的汇总分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Understanding participant demographic characteristics that inform the optimal design of obesity randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been examined in few studies. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of individual participant characteristics and dropout rates (DORs) in obesity RCTs by pooling data from several publicly available datasets for analyses. We comprehensively characterize DORs and patterns in obesity RCTs at the individual study level, and describe how such rates and patterns vary as a function of individual level characteristics.>Methods: We obtained and analyzed nine publicly available, obesity RCT datasets that examined weight loss or weight gain prevention as a primary or secondary endpoint. Four risk factors for dropout were examined by Cox proportional hazards including sex, age, baseline BMI, and race/ethnicity. The individual study data were pooled in the final analyses with a random effect for study, and HR and 95% CIs were computed.>Results: Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that the risk of dropout was significantly higher for females compared to males (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.46). Hispanics and Non-Hispanic blacks had a significantly higher dropout rate compared to non-Hispanic whites (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.37, 1.91; HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.35, respectively). There was a significantly increased risk of dropout associated with advancing age (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.02) and increasing BMI (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.04).>Conclusion/Significance: As more studies may focus on special populations, researchers designing obesity RCTs may wish to oversample in certain demographic groups if attempting to match comparison groups based on generalized estimates of expected DORs, or otherwise adjust a priori power estimates. Understanding true reasons for dropout may require additional methods of data gathering not generally employed in obesity RCTs, e.g., time on treatment.
机译:>引言:在少数研究中已经检查了了解参与者的人口统计学特征,这些特征为肥胖症的随机对照试验(RCT)的最佳设计提供了依据。这项研究的目的是通过汇总几个公开可用的数据集中的数据来研究肥胖RCT中个体参与者特征与辍学率(DOR)的关联。我们在个体研究水平上全面描述了肥胖RCT中的DOR和模式,并描述了这种速率和模式如何随个体水平特征而变化。>方法:我们获得并分析了9种公开可用的肥胖RCT将减肥或预防体重增加作为主要或次要终点的数据集。通过Cox比例风险检查了四个辍学风险因素,包括性别,年龄,基线BMI和种族/民族。在最终分析中汇总了单个研究数据,并对研究进行了随机效果,并计算了HR和95%CI。>结果:多变量分析的结果表明,辍学的风险明显更高女性与男性相比(HR = 1.24,95%CI = 1.05,1.46)。与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人的辍学率明显更高(HR = 1.62,95%CI = 1.37,1.91; HR = 1.22,95%CI = 1.11,1.35)。与年龄增长相关的辍学风险显着增加(HR = 1.02,95%CI = 1.01,1.02)和BMI升高(HR = 1.03,95%CI = 1.03,1.04)。>结论/意义:< / strong>随着更多的研究可能集中在特殊人群上,设计肥胖症RCT的研究人员可能希望在基于预期DOR的一般估计来匹配比较组的情况下,或者在其他方面调整先验功效估计值的情况下,对某些人口群体进行过度抽样。了解辍学的真正原因可能需要其他在肥胖RCT中通常不使用的数据收集方法,例如治疗时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号