首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills
【2h】

Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills

机译:判断陌生人的可信度与心理技能理论相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger’s intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory of mind (ToM). We tested a group of healthy participants and a group of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Both groups made ToM judgments and judged the trustworthiness of strangers. Participants were also assessed for their disposition to trust as well as levels of paranoid belief. As anticipated, healthy participants had a normal ToM scores and patients with paranoid schizophrenia had poor ToM scores. In paranoid patients, better ability to read others’ minds was associated with judging others as more trustworthy, while the reverse was found in the healthy participants (better mind reading was associated with judging others as less trustworthy), suggesting a non-linear relationship between trust in others and being able to read their intentions.
机译:信任别人需要对他们进行评估,以评估他们的可信度。评估陌生人的意图很可能是评估信任度的一种方法。本研究检验了以下假设:可信赖度的判断与阅读能力有关,也称为心理理论(ToM)。我们测试了一组健康的参与者和一组偏执型精神分裂症患者。两组都做出ToM判断并判断陌生人的可信度。还评估了参与者的信任感以及偏执信念的程度。正如预期的那样,健康参与者的ToM得分正常,而偏执型精神分裂症患者的ToM得分较差。在偏执狂患者中,更好的朗读能力与评判他人更值得信赖相关,而在健康参与者中则发现相反(更好的朗读与评判他人更不值得信赖相关),表明两者之间存在非线性关系。信任他人并能够读懂他们的意图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号