首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Individual differences in the perception of biological motion and fragmented figures are not correlated
【2h】

Individual differences in the perception of biological motion and fragmented figures are not correlated

机译:个体对生物运动的感知差异和不完整的数字不相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We live in a cluttered, dynamic visual environment that poses a challenge for the visual system: for objects, including those that move about, to be perceived, information specifying those objects must be integrated over space and over time. Does a single, omnibus mechanism perform this grouping operation, or does grouping depend on separate processes specialized for different feature aspects of the object? To address this question, we tested a large group of healthy young adults on their abilities to perceive static fragmented figures embedded in noise and to perceive dynamic point-light biological motion figures embedded in dynamic noise. There were indeed substantial individual differences in performance on both tasks, but none of the statistical tests we applied to this data set uncovered a significant correlation between those performance measures. These results suggest that the two tasks, despite their superficial similarity, require different segmentation and grouping processes that are largely unrelated to one another. Whether those processes are embodied in distinct neural mechanisms remains an open question.
机译:我们生活在一个混乱,动态的视觉环境中,这对视觉系统构成了挑战:对于物体(包括那些在附近移动的物体),要感知它们,指定这些物体的信息必须在空间和时间上进行整合。是由单个综合机制执行此分组操作,还是分组取决于专门针对对象不同特征方面的单独过程?为了解决这个问题,我们对一大批健康的年轻人进行了测试,以了解他们感知嵌入在噪声中的静态碎片图形以及感知嵌入在动态噪声中的动态点光源生物运动图形的能力。在这两个任务上确实存在明显的个体差异,但是我们应用于此数据集的统计测试均未发现这些绩效指标之间存在显着相关性。这些结果表明,尽管这两项任务表面上相似,但仍需要不同的细分和分组过程,而这在很大程度上彼此无关。这些过程是否体现在不同的神经机制中仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号