首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Endurance Performance during Severe-Intensity Intermittent Cycling: Effect of Exercise Duration and Recovery Type
【2h】

Endurance Performance during Severe-Intensity Intermittent Cycling: Effect of Exercise Duration and Recovery Type

机译:大强度间歇循环中的耐力表现:运动时间和恢复类型的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Slow component of oxygen uptake (VO2SC) kinetics and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) attainment seem to influence endurance performance during constant-work rate exercise (CWR) performed within the severe intensity domain. In this study, it was hypothesized that delaying the attainment of VO2max by reducing the rates at which VO2 increases with time (VO2SC kinetics) would improve the endurance performance during severe-intensity intermittent exercise performed with different work:recovery duration and recovery type in active individuals. After the estimation of the parameters of the VO2SC kinetics during CWR exercise, 18 males were divided into two groups (Passive and Active recovery) and performed at different days, two intermittent exercises to exhaustion (at 95% IVO2max, with work: recovery ratio of 2:1) with the duration of the repetitions calculated from the onset of the exercise to the beginning of the VO2SC (Short) or to the half duration of the VO2SC (Long). The active recovery was performed at 50% IVO2max. The endurance performance during intermittent exercises for the Passive (Short = 1523 ± 411; Long = 984 ± 260 s) and Active (Short = 902 ± 239; Long = 886 ± 254 s) groups was improved compared with CWR condition (Passive = 540 ± 116; Active = 489 ± 84 s). For Passive group, the endurance performance was significantly higher for Short than Long condition. However, no significant difference between Short and Long conditions was found for Active group. Additionally, the endurance performance during Short condition was higher for Passive than Active group. The VO2SC kinetics was significantly increased for CWR (Passive = 0.16 ± 0.04; Active = 0.16 ± 0.04 L.min−2) compared with Short (Passive = 0.01 ± 0.01; Active = 0.03 ± 0.04 L.min−2) and Long (Passive = 0.02 ± 0.01; Active = 0.01 ± 0.01 L.min−2) intermittent exercise conditions. No significant difference was found among the intermittent exercises. It can be concluded that the endurance performance is negatively influenced by active recovery only during shorter high-intensity intermittent exercise. Moreover, the improvement in endurance performance seems not be explained by differences in the VO2SC kinetics, since its values were similar among all intermittent exercise conditions.
机译:缓慢的摄氧量(VO2SC)动力学和最大摄氧量(VO2max)获得似乎会影响在严重强度范围内进行的恒定工作量运动(CWR)期间的耐力表现。在这项研究中,假设通过降低VO2随时间增加的速率(VO2SC动力学)来延迟VO2max的获得将改善在进行不同工作的剧烈间歇运动中的耐力表现:恢复时间和活跃的恢复类型个人。在估算了CWR运动过程中的VO2SC动力学参数后,将18位男性分为两组(被动恢复和主动恢复),并在不同的日子进行两次间歇性的力竭锻炼(95%IVO2max,工作:恢复比率为2:1),重复的持续时间从锻炼开始到VO2SC的开始(短)或VO2SC的一半的持续时间(长)计算。主动恢复以50%IVO2max进行。与CWR状态(被动= 540)相比,被动(短时间= 1523±411;长时间= 984±260 s)和活动时间(短时间= 902±239;长时间= 886±254 s)的间歇性锻炼的耐力性能得到了改善。 ±116;活动= 489±84 s)。对于被动组,短时耐力性能比长时耐力性能显着更高。但是,活动组的短期和长期条件之间没有发现显着差异。此外,被动组的“短时”条件下的耐力性能要高于主动组。与短时(被动= 0.01±0.01;主动= 0.03±0.04 L)相比,CWR的VO2SC动力学显着提高(被动= 0.16±0.04;主动= 0.16±0.04 L.min -2 )。 min −2 )和长时间(被动= 0.02±0.01;主动= 0.01±0.01 L.min −2 )间歇性运动条件。在间歇练习之间没有发现显着差异。可以得出结论,只有在较短的高强度间歇运动中,主动恢复才能对耐力表现产生负面影响。此外,持久力表现的改善似乎无法用VO2SC动力学的差异来解释,因为在所有间歇运动条件下,其值均相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号