首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience >Evaluating Complexity of Fetal MEG Signals: A Comparison of Different Metrics and Their Applicability
【2h】

Evaluating Complexity of Fetal MEG Signals: A Comparison of Different Metrics and Their Applicability

机译:评估胎儿MEG信号的复杂性:不同指标的比较及其适用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this work, we aim to investigate whether information based metrics of neural activity are a useful tool for the quantification of consciousness before and shortly after birth. Neural activity is measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG) in human fetuses and neonates. Based on recent theories on consciousness, information-based metrics are established to measure brain complexity and to assess different levels of consciousness. Different metrics (measures of entropy, compressibility and fractality) are, thus, explored in a reference population and their usability is evaluated. For comparative analysis, two fMEG channels were selected: one where brain activity was previously detected and one at least 15 cm away, that represented a control channel. The usability of each metric was evaluated and results from the brain and control channel were compared. Concerning the ease of use with fMEG data, Lempel-Ziv-Complexity (LZC) was evaluated as best, as it is unequivocal and needs low computational effort. The fractality measures have a high number of parameters that need to be adjusted prior to analysis and therefore forfeit comparability, while entropy measures require a higher computational effort and more parameters to adjust compared to LZC. Comparison of a channel with brain activity and a control channel in neonatal recordings showed significant differences in most complexity metrics. This clear difference can be seen as proof of concept for the usability of complexity metrics in fMEG. For fetal data, this comparison produced less clear results which can be related to leftover maternal signals included in the control channel. Further work is necessary to conclusively interpret results from the analysis of fetal recordings. Yet this study shows that complexity metrics can be used for fMEG data on early consciousness and the evaluation gives a guidance for future work. The inconsistency of results from different metrics highlights the challenges of working with complexity metrics as neural correlates of consciousness, as well as the caution one should apply to interpret them.
机译:在这项工作中,我们旨在调查基于信息的神经活动指标是否是量化出生前和出生后不久意识的有用工具。使用人类胎儿和新生儿的胎儿脑磁图(fMEG)测量神经活动。基于最新的意识理论,建立了基于信息的度量标准来测量大脑的复杂性并评估不同的意识水平。因此,在参考人群中探索了不同的指标(熵,可压缩性和分形性的度量),并评估了它们的可用性。为了进行比较分析,选择了两个fMEG通道:一个以前检测到大脑活动的通道,另一个至少15厘米远的通道,代表控制通道。评估每个指标的可用性,并比较来自大脑和对照通道的结果。关于使用fMEG数据的易用性,Lempel-Ziv-Complexity(LZC)被认为是最佳的,因为它毫不含糊且需要较少的计算工作。分形度量具有大量参数,需要在分析之前进行调整,因此丧失了可比性,而熵度量则需要比LZC更高的计算量和更多的参数来调整。新生儿记录中具有大脑活动的通道和对照通道的比较显示,大多数复杂性指标存在显着差异。这种明显的差异可以看作是fMEG中复杂性指标可用性的概念证明。对于胎儿数据,此比较产生的结果不太清楚,这可能与控制通道中包含的剩余母体信号有关。有必要做进一步的工作来最终解释胎儿记录的分析结果。然而,这项研究表明,复杂度指标可以用于早期意识的fMEG数据,该评估为将来的工作提供了指导。来自不同指标的结果不一致,凸显了使用复杂性指标作为意识的神经相关因素所面临的挑战,以及在解释这些指标时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号