首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Prospective Comparative Quality Control Study of a Novel Gravity-Driven Hollow-Fiber Whole Blood Separation System for the Production of Canine Blood Products
【2h】

Prospective Comparative Quality Control Study of a Novel Gravity-Driven Hollow-Fiber Whole Blood Separation System for the Production of Canine Blood Products

机译:新型重力驱动空心纤维全血分离系统生产犬血液制品的前瞻性比较质量控制研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this prospective study was to compare quality of blood products produced either by a novel gravity-driven hollow-fiber separation system (HF) or by centrifugation (C). Whole blood was obtained from 31 healthy non-greyhound canine blood donors and separated into fresh frozen plasma and packed red blood cells using either HF or C in a university teaching hospital. Red blood cell (RBC) count, albumin and fibrinogen concentration, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and coagulation factor activity (FV, FVIII), von Willebrand Factor (vWF), and antithrombin activity were assessed. Plasma obtained with the HF showed a significantly higher median PT (9.4 vs. 7.9 s, P = 0.0006) and aPTT (14.9 vs. 13.1 s, P = 0.0128) than plasma prepared with C. Lower albumin (21.7 vs. 23.5 g/l, P = 0.0162) and fibrinogen (1.0 vs. 1.5 g/l, P = 0.0005) concentrations and activities of FV (105 vs. 114%, P = 0.0021) and antithrombin (104 vs. 117%, P = 0.0024) were seen in blood products obtained with the HF. In contrast, vWF was not affected by the method of plasma separation. Compared to HF, RBC count as well as hematocrit were not significantly higher (8.0 vs. 8.9 1012/l, P = 0.1308; 0.57 vs. 0.62 l/l, P = 0.0736) when blood products were prepared with C. In conclusion, higher quality of blood products especially regarding coagulation parameters and RBCs was achieved by using C compared to HF. Despite the statistical significances, however, the clinical relevance has to be further elucidated. Nevertheless, HF provides an alternative to produce blood products if a centrifuge is not available.
机译:这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较通过新型重力驱动的中空纤维分离系统(HF)或离心分离(C)产生的血液制品的质量。在大学教学医院中使用HF或C从31位健康的非灵狮犬的献血者那里获取全血,并分离成新鲜的冷冻血浆和红细胞。评估了红细胞(RBC)计数,白蛋白和纤维蛋白原浓度,凝血酶原时间(PT),活化的部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和凝血因子活性(FV,FVIII),血管性血友病因子(vWF)和抗凝血酶活性。用HF获得的血浆显示的中位PT(9.4 vs. 7.9 s,P = 0.0006)和aPTT(14.9 vs. 13.1 s,P = 0.0128)显着高于用C制备的血浆。较低的白蛋白(21.7 vs.23.5 g / l,P = 0.0162)和纤维蛋白原(1.0 vs.1.5 g / l,P = 0.0005)的浓度和FV(105 vs. 114%,P = 0.0021)和抗凝血酶的活性(104 vs. 117%,P = 0.0024)在用HF获得的血液制品中可见到。相反,vWF不受血浆分离方法的影响。与HF相比,血液制品的RBC计数和血细胞比容没有显着提高(8.0 vs. 8.9 10 12 / l,P = 0.1308; 0.57 vs. 0.62 l / l,P = 0.0736)总之,与HF相比,使用C可以达到更高的血液制品质量,尤其是在凝血参数和RBC方面。尽管具有统计学意义,但仍需要进一步阐明其临床意义。但是,如果没有离心机,HF可提供生产血液制品的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号