首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations the Effects of Inbreeding and Response to Selection
【2h】

Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations the Effects of Inbreeding and Response to Selection

机译:基因组印迹的定量遗传学:比较简单的方差派生近交的影响和对选择的响应。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The level of expression of an imprinted gene is dependent on the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. As a result, reciprocal heterozygotes in a population may have different mean phenotypes for quantitative traits. Using standard quantitative genetic methods for deriving breeding values, population variances, and covariances between relatives, we demonstrate that although these approaches are equivalent under Mendelian expression, this equivalence is lost when genomic imprinting is acting. Imprinting introduces both parent-of-origin-dependent and generation-dependent effects that result in differences in the way additive and dominance effects are defined for the various approaches. Further, imprinting creates a covariance between additive and dominance terms absent under Mendelian expression, but the expression for this covariance cannot be derived using a number of the standard approaches for defining additive and dominance terms. Inbreeding also generates such a covariance, and we demonstrate that a modified method for partitioning variances can easily accommodate both inbreeding and imprinting. As with inbreeding, the concept of breeding values has no useful meaning for an imprinted trait. Finally, we derive the expression for the response to selection under imprinting, and conclude that the response to selection for an imprinted trait cannot be predicted from the breeder’s equation, even when there is no dominance.
机译:印迹基因的表达水平取决于遗传基因的亲本性别。结果,群体中的相互杂合子可能在数量性状上具有不同的平均表型。使用标准的定量遗传方法得出亲代之间的育种值,种群方差和协方差,我们证明,尽管这些方法在孟德尔表达下是等效的,但是当基因组印迹起作用时,这种等效性会丢失。烙印引入了与原产地相关的效应和与世代相关的效应,这导致了为各种方法定义加性和优势效应的方式有所不同。此外,压印会在孟德尔表达式下不存在加性项和优势项之间创建协方差,但是无法使用许多用于定义加性项和优势项的标准方法来得出此协方差的表达式。近交也产生这样的协方差,并且我们证明了一种用于划分方差的改进方法可以轻松容纳近交和烙印。与近亲繁殖一样,育种价值的概念对于印记的性状没有任何有用的意义。最后,我们推导了印记下对选择的响应的表达式,并得出结论,即使没有优势,也不能从育种者的方程式中预测对印记性状的选择的响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号