首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >The Teamwork Assessment Scale: A Novel Instrument to Assess Quality of Undergraduate Medical Students Teamwork Using the Example of Simulation-based Ward-Rounds
【2h】

The Teamwork Assessment Scale: A Novel Instrument to Assess Quality of Undergraduate Medical Students Teamwork Using the Example of Simulation-based Ward-Rounds

机译:团队合作评估量表:一种基于模拟病房圆规评估本科医学生团队合作质量的新工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Simulation-based teamwork trainings are considered a powerful training method to advance teamwork, which becomes more relevant in medical education. The measurement of teamwork is of high importance and several instruments have been developed for various medical domains to meet this need. To our knowledge, no theoretically-based and easy-to-use measurement instrument has been published nor developed specifically for simulation-based teamwork trainings of medical students. Internist ward-rounds function as an important example of teamwork in medicine.>Purposes: The purpose of this study was to provide a validated, theoretically-based instrument that is easy-to-use. Furthermore, this study aimed to identify if and when rater scores relate to performance.>Methods: Based on a theoretical framework for teamwork behaviour, items regarding four teamwork components (Team Coordination, Team Cooperation, Information Exchange, Team Adjustment Behaviours) were developed. In study one, three ward-round scenarios, simulated by 69 students, were videotaped and rated independently by four trained raters. The instrument was tested for the embedded psychometric properties and factorial structure. In study two, the instrument was tested for construct validity with an external criterion with a second set of 100 students and four raters. >Results: In study one, the factorial structure matched the theoretical components but was unable to separate Information Exchange and Team Cooperation. The preliminary version showed adequate psychometric properties (Cronbach’s α=.75). In study two, the instrument showed physician rater scores were more reliable in measurement than those of student raters. Furthermore, a close correlation between the scale and clinical performance as an external criteria was shown (r=.64) and the sufficient psychometric properties were replicated (Cronbach’s α=.78).>Conclusions: The validation allows for use of the simulated teamwork assessment scale in undergraduate medical ward-round trainings to reliably measure teamwork by physicians. Further studies are needed to verify the applicability of the instrument.
机译:>背景:基于模拟的团队合作培训被认为是促进团队合作的强大培训方法,在医学教育中变得越来越重要。团队合作的衡量非常重要,并且已经针对各种医学领域开发了多种仪器来满足这一需求。据我们所知,还没有针对医学生基于模拟的团队合作训练发表或专门开发基于理论和易于使用的测量工具。内部专家病房检查是医学团队合作的重要例子。>目的:本研究的目的是提供一种经过验证的,基于理论的,易于使用的仪器。此外,本研究旨在确定评估者分数是否以及何时与绩效相关。>方法:基于团队合作行为的理论框架,涉及团队合作的四个组成部分(团队协调,团队合作,信息交换,团队)调整行为)。在研究一中,对由69名学生模拟的三个病房情景进行了录像,并由四名训练有素的评估者进行独立评估。测试了该仪器的嵌入式心理测量特性和阶乘结构。在研究二中,使用外部标准对仪器进行了结构效度测试,第二组为100名学生和四个评分者。 >结果:在研究一中,阶乘结构与理论组成相匹配,但无法将信息交换与团队合作区分开。初步版本显示出足够的心理测量特性(克伦巴赫的α= .75)。在研究二中,该仪器显示医师评估者评分在测量中比学生评估者更可靠。此外,显示了作为外部标准的量表与临床表现之间的密切相关性(r = .64),并且复制了足够的心理计量学特性(Cronbach'sα= .78)。>结论:在大学医学病房训练中使用模拟的团队合作评估量表来可靠地衡量医生的团队合作。需要进一步研究以验证该仪器的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号