首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >Using the Progress Test Medizin (PTM) for evaluation of the Medical Curriculum Munich (MeCuM)
【2h】

Using the Progress Test Medizin (PTM) for evaluation of the Medical Curriculum Munich (MeCuM)

机译:使用进度测试Medizin(PTM)评估慕尼黑医学课程(MeCuM)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Aims: The Medical Curriculum Munich (MeCuM) has been implemented since 2004 and was completely established in 2007. In this study the clinical part of MeCuM was evaluated with respect to retention of the knowledge in internal medicine (learning objectives of the 6th/7th semester). >Methods: In summer of 2009 and winter of 2009/2010 1065 students participated in the Progress Test Medizin (PTM) from Charité Medical School Berlin. Additionally the students answered a questionnaire regarding the acceptance and rating of the progress test and basic demographic data. >Results: The knowledge of internal medicine continuously increases during the clinical part of the medical curriculum in Munich. However, significant differences between the sub-disciplines of internal medicine could be observed. The overall acceptance of the PTM was high and increased further with the study progress. Interestingly, practical experiences like clinical clerkships positively influenced the test score. >Conclusions: The PTM is a useful tool for the evaluation of knowledge retention in a specific curriculum.
机译:>目标:慕尼黑医学课程(MeCuM)自2004年开始实施,并于2007年完全建立。在这项研究中,对MeCuM的临床部分进行了评估,以保留内部医学知识(学习)。第六/第七学期的目标)。 >方法:在2009年夏季和2009/2010年冬季,有1065名学生参加了柏林Charité医学院的Progress Test Medizin(PTM)。此外,学生回答了有关进度测试和基本人口统计数据的接受程度和等级的问卷。 >结果:在慕尼黑医学课程的临床部分中,内科知识不断增加。但是,可以观察到内科各学科之间存在显着差异。 PTM的总体接受度很高,并且随着研究的进展而进一步增加。有趣的是,像临床文员这样的实践经验对考试成绩有积极的影响。 >结论: PTM是评估特定课程中知识保留的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号