首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Balance billing: the patients perspective
【2h】

Balance billing: the patients perspective

机译:余额计费:患者的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We study the effects of 'balance billing', i.e., allowing physicians to charge a fee from patients in addition to the fee paid by Medicare. First, we show that on pure efficiency grounds the optimal Medicare fee under balance billing is zero. An active Medicare policy thus can only be justified when distributional concerns are accounted for. Extending the analysis by Glazer and McGuire, we therefore analyze the optimal policy from the patients' point of view. We demonstrate that, from the patients' perspective, a positive fee can be superior under balance billing. Furthermore, patient welfare can be lower if balance billing is prohibited. In particular, this is the case if the administrative costs of Medicare are large. However, we cannot rule out that prohibiting balance billing may be superior. Finally, we show that payer fee discrimination increases patient welfare if Medicare's administrative costs are high or if Medicare's optimal fee under balance billing implies lower quality for fee-only patients.JEL>-classification: I11, I18, H51
机译:我们研究了``余额计费''的效果,即允许医生从Medicare支付的费用中收取患者的费用。首先,我们证明,基于纯效率的理由,余额计费下的最佳Medicare费用为零。因此,只有考虑到分配问题,才有理由采取积极的Medicare政策。因此,通过扩展Glazer和McGuire的分析,我们从患者的角度分析了最佳策略。我们证明,从患者的角度来看,在余额计费方式下,阳性费用可能会更高。此外,如果禁止使用余额计费,患者的福利可能会降低。如果Medicare的行政成本很高,则尤其如此。但是,我们不能排除禁止余额结算的优势。最后,我们证明,如果Medicare的行政成本很高,或者如果余额计费下Medicare的最佳费用暗示仅收费患者的质量较低,则付款人费用歧视会增加患者的福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号